Iran’s Foreign Minister: Prepared for Any European ‘Snapback’ Response!

Amid escalating tensions and discussions surrounding Iran’s nuclear program, Abbas Araghchi recently shared insights during an interview with the local Iranian news outlet IRNA. This conversation comes on the heels of intensified debates about the potential resumption of diplomatic efforts that were disrupted following the attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities by Israel and the United States in June.

In this context, the European nations have signaled their intention to activate the snapback mechanism embedded within the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). This action would restore all United Nations sanctions on Iran prior to the official expiration of the agreement in October. Araghchi firmly stated that the Europeans lack the authority to pursue such measures, given their recent positions, including discussions around “zero enrichment,” which he argues have effectively disqualified them as participants in the JCPOA.

“They think the snapback is the only tool they have,” he emphasized. “Here we have clearly explained our position: first, you have basically no right to use it as you, too, have effectively withdrawn from the deal following the US withdrawal, and with your recent positions, including the zero enrichment. So you’re no longer a participant in the JCPOA, and the right to snapback belongs only to remaining members.”

Furthermore, Araghchi indicated that invoking the snapback mechanism would likely signify the end of Europe’s involvement in diplomatic discussions regarding Iran’s nuclear activities. He stated, “Even if we assume you have the right, what will happen if you do it? First, Europe’s role in diplomacy will be completely over. You’ve used the tool, and it’s done. What remains after that? The end of diplomacy?”

Despite the potential repercussions, the foreign minister expressed that Iran is actively working to prevent such an outcome. He underlined that while the psychological impact of reinstating UN Security Council resolutions, including possible arms embargoes, is serious, the actual economic consequences would be minimal. “The economic sanctions of the Security Council are far more limited than the current unilateral US sanctions,” he noted. “Things will not become any worse than the current situation. Yes, from a psychological and political, and even strategic point of view, there are consequences, but not to the extent that it would bring diplomacy to a dead end or paralyze the country.”

Additionally, Araghchi revealed that Iran, in collaboration with its allies China and Russia, has been devising strategies to counter the snapback threat for several years. “We have had various joint meetings and designed a series of joint measures that we will implement if the snapback is activated,” he stated.

Negotiations with the IAEA

In parallel to these diplomatic efforts, Iran is engaging in separate negotiations with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) following the recent US-Israeli assaults on its nuclear facilities. Araghchi mentioned that Iran has initiated discussions with the IAEA aimed at establishing a new framework for cooperation.

He clarified that this new cooperation will not mirror past arrangements, as the recent attacks have introduced unprecedented security considerations. “This new cooperation with the Agency will definitely not be similar to the past, especially because according to the law of the parliament, all matters must be pursued through the Supreme National Security Council, which decides where and how inspections will or will not be carried out,” he explained.

While outlining the future of these negotiations, Araghchi asserted that a complete cessation of collaboration with the IAEA is not on the agenda. He emphasized the importance of maintaining some level of cooperation, particularly for routine activities such as fuel rod replacements at the Bushehr nuclear power plant. “Inspectors need to be present for routine activities,” he stated, reinforcing the necessity of continued oversight even amidst heightened tensions.

As the situation evolves, it is clear that Iran remains committed to navigating the complexities of its nuclear program while engaging with international entities. The diplomatic landscape is fraught with challenges, yet Iran’s strategic partnerships and ongoing talks reflect a proactive approach to safeguarding its interests in a rapidly changing geopolitical environment.