From Al-Qaeda Allies to Julani Defenders: America's Complex Role in Terrorism Manufacturing

In recent discussions surrounding terrorism and geopolitical stability, the United States’ role in supporting terrorist organizations has come under scrutiny. The comments made by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio during his meeting in Al-Quds with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are indicative of a broader American strategy aimed at obscuring its involvement in destabilizing the West Asian region.

The U.S. has long been accused of utilizing terrorism to further its political objectives in the Middle East. Notable admissions from various American officials have shed light on this troubling reality.

American Admissions: From al-Qaeda to ISIS

The assertion that the U.S. supports terrorism is not merely a claim made by its adversaries; it is a well-documented fact supported by statements from prominent figures within the U.S. government. For instance, in 2016, former President Donald Trump stated, “Obama is the founder of ISIS, and Clinton is his co-founder.” This assertion was not a mere gaffe but rather a reflection of the evidence surrounding U.S. actions in the region.

At the onset of the Syrian conflict, the U.S., through the CIA, provided both financial and logistical support to various terrorist factions masquerading as the “moderate opposition.” Investigative reports from The Washington Post have repeatedly unveiled this controversial strategy.

Former Secretary of State John Kerry was recorded admitting that the U.S. intentionally allowed ISIS to gain strength in Syria, hoping to leverage this for political gains against the Assad regime.
Current Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, revealed in 2019 that the U.S. was directly arming and funding al-Qaeda fighters in Syria.
Recently, former Senator Richard Black corroborated these claims, emphasizing the U.S. support for terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS.

Senator Black’s statements are significant as they reveal the extent of U.S. involvement in the Syrian conflict. He highlighted how these groups acted as instruments for U.S. interests.

Historical Evidence Supporting the Claims

Senator Black’s assertions echo long-standing concerns regarding U.S. support for groups such as Jabhat al-Nusra, al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria. The following points illustrate this troubling relationship:

United Nations reports have documented U.S. backing for Jabhat al-Nusra via channels in Turkey and Qatar, aimed at destabilizing the Assad government.
Western intelligence has confirmed that American weapons have fallen into the hands of ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra through so-called “moderate opposition” fighters.

These revelations make it increasingly difficult to dismiss the notion that the U.S. has played a dual role in the Syrian conflict—both as a purported peacekeeper and as an enabler of terrorism.

Al-Julani: From Wanted Terrorist to U.S.-Backed Ruler

Rubio’s remarks regarding instability in Syria conveniently overlook the U.S.’s backing of Abu Mohammed al-Julani, the leader of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, previously known as Jabhat al-Nusra. Once listed as a terrorist by the U.S., al-Julani now holds substantial power in Syria, receiving both direct and indirect American support.

Al-Julani has transformed from a notorious terrorist to a pivotal figure in U.S. strategies in Syria. Here are key points regarding his new role:

He has been depicted as a “moderate opposition leader” by American media, despite his history of human rights violations.
A report by the RAND Corporation suggests that the U.S. views al-Julani as a potential partner for future alliances.
His involvement has led to significant atrocities, including the massacre of over 22,000 Alawites, yet he remains unpunished.

The U.S. continues to support al-Julani, facilitating his rise under the guise of promoting stability while ignoring his past actions. This pattern clearly illustrates Washington’s preference for chaos over genuine peace in the region.

Unconditional Support for the Zionist Entity

Rubio’s comments also reflect the U.S.’s unwavering support for Israel, which has been accused of state-sponsored terrorism. Since the escalation of conflict in Gaza, Israeli forces have claimed numerous civilian lives, including women and children. This violence occurs under the protective umbrella of the U.S., which has consistently shielded Israel from international condemnation.

The U.S. has historically supported groups like the South Lebanon Army, which perpetrated atrocities against civilians.
Israel has provided medical care to injured Jabhat al-Nusra fighters while simultaneously launching attacks on Syrian territory.

This complicity in violence further exemplifies America’s double standards when it comes to defining terrorism.

Double Standards: “Good” vs. “Bad” Terrorism

The U.S. often labels groups resisting Israeli occupation as “terrorists,” while those it supports in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan are deemed “moderate.” This selective classification raises critical questions about the legitimacy of America’s anti-terrorism narrative.

Iran has also been painted as a supporter of terrorism, yet supporting oppressed populations fighting against occupation should not be equated to acts of terrorism. The U.S. attempts to distort the narrative, suggesting that those defending their land are terrorists while those enforcing occupation are seen as champions of democracy.

America: The True Godfather of Terrorism

If Rubio seeks the true source of instability, he need only look toward Washington. The U.S.’s support for groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS, combined with its complicity in the actions of individuals like al-Julani, illustrates how America plays a pivotal role in perpetuating conflict rather than resolving it.

History will not absolve those who have contributed to the rise of terrorism while claiming to combat it. The global community is becoming increasingly aware of who truly supports the cause of peace and who conspires against it.