Western States Exploit Snapback Mechanism to Justify Controversial Actions

Western States Exploit Snapback Mechanism to Justify Controversial Actions

In a recent interview with Qatar’s Al Araby TV network during the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, President Pezeshkian discussed pressing regional and international issues, particularly the snapback mechanism and Iran’s commitment to its nuclear agreements. This conversation sheds light on Iran’s diplomatic stance and its call for clearer communication with the global community.

During the interview, President Pezeshkian underscored the necessity of clarifying Iran’s position to the international audience. He criticized the UN Security Council’s endorsement of the snapback mechanism, asserting that such decisions are influenced more by the pressures from the United States and certain European nations than by existing legal frameworks. He remarked, “We adhered to the agreement we signed, but it was the US that violated it,” highlighting the hypocrisy of nations that accuse Iran of non-compliance.

Pezeshkian also touched upon a recent agreement reached with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) through Egyptian mediation. He noted that this agreement established a framework for cooperation, stating, “We announced our readiness to engage with the IAEA.” Additionally, he expressed Iran’s willingness to negotiate with the US, while pointing out that it was the US that had declined to engage in discussions.

When questioned about the potential for dialogue with the US, Pezeshkian raised concerns about American intentions. He recounted that while negotiations were ongoing, the US allowed Israeli attacks on Iranian facilities. He asserted, “A country that does not respect humanitarian principles cannot claim to be ready for dialogue.”

Furthermore, Pezeshkian referred to a proposal from Europe that he deemed ineffective. He stated, “Give us your enriched uranium, and then we will give you three months to discuss the other issues. But why should we hand over our enriched uranium? For what reason? If a dialogue is to take place, it should encompass the entire issue, not just require us to relinquish our assets and then wait.”

Addressing the actions of the Israeli regime in the region, he firmly asserted that Iran has never sought to create unrest; rather, it is the Israeli regime that pursues such actions. He emphasized that Iran’s goal is to promote peace and cooperation with its neighbors, adding, “We have extended our hand of friendship to all countries in the region. And today, many countries in the region know that we truly act based on Islamic brotherhood. However, the problem is that they [Israelis] do not want peace in the region, and unrest is more profitable for them than peace and stability.”

Pezeshkian also reflected on the impact of the recent conflict instigated by the Israeli regime, stating that it has fostered unity within Iran. He noted, “This attack has strengthened the social capital in the country,” remarking that the Iranian people have rallied together in response to external aggression.

Looking to the future, Pezeshkian expressed confidence in Iran’s resilience against external pressures. He stated, “I believe that through cooperation, solidarity, and unity, Iranians can solve their problems.”

In response to a query about decision-making in Iran regarding the nuclear issue, the president explained, “The country’s major policies are determined by the Supreme Leader based on consultations with the National Security Council and a group of politicians. However, the final word and decision are announced by the Supreme Leader according to the Constitution.”

Pezeshkian emphasized the importance of faith and the necessity for Muslims to unite against common threats. He stated, “If Muslims come together as brothers, they will not allow the Israeli regime to act with impunity.”

In conclusion, Pezeshkian reaffirmed Iran’s commitment to peaceful dialogue and cooperation, noting that Iranians are ready to extend their hand of friendship to all Muslim nations. This commitment underscores Iran’s desire for stability and peace in the region, despite the challenges it faces.

This interview not only highlights President Pezeshkian’s insights but also reflects Iran’s broader diplomatic strategies in navigating complex international relations, particularly in the context of its nuclear program and regional stability.

For more updates on international diplomacy and regional issues, stay tuned to our news portal.

MNA/President.ir

Similar Posts

  • Araghchi to Trump: Flattery Falls Short in Restoring Iran’s Trust

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that the new US administration must take substantial actions beyond “nice words” to restore trust and engage in negotiations for a new nuclear agreement. Reflecting on the US’s withdrawal from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal during Trump’s presidency, he emphasized that Iran had complied with the agreement despite the US’s “maximum pressure” policy. Araghchi warned that any military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities would provoke an immediate and decisive response. He also criticized Trump’s remarks on Gaza, suggesting a mock solution instead. The situation remains complex and tense as diplomatic efforts continue.

  • Iran’s Leading Sunni Cleric Calls for Direct US Dialogue, Challenging Supreme Leader’s Stance

    Iran’s senior Sunni leader, Mowlavi Abdolhamid Ismaeelzahi, has advocated for direct negotiations with the United States and global powers, challenging Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s stance against such talks. He emphasized that intermediaries often fail to represent national interests effectively. This call for direct dialogue contrasts sharply with Khamenei’s rejection of negotiations, as he warned of a strong response to US threats, including military action. Meanwhile, concerns about Iran’s economic crisis have prompted some officials to suggest that engagement with the US could alleviate sanctions. The debate over negotiation strategies reflects deep divisions within Iran’s leadership regarding foreign relations.

  • New Details Unveiled: Time and Venue Confirmed for 4th Iran-US Talks

    The fourth round of indirect talks between Iran and the United States is scheduled for May 11 in Oman, aiming to address ongoing tensions and seek diplomatic solutions. US envoy Steve Witkoff labeled previous discussions as “positive” and expressed optimism about progress, emphasizing the desire for a diplomatic resolution. Despite the US’s call for the dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear program, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has verified Iran’s commitment to a peaceful nuclear policy. Iran insists on not negotiating its uranium enrichment or sanctions relief. Both sides have characterized the dialogues as constructive, with hopes for a peaceful resolution.

  • Iran’s Araqchi: Unwavering Commitment to Achieving a Fair Agreement

    Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi reaffirmed the country’s commitment to achieving a fair and balanced agreement during ongoing indirect negotiations with Omani and American officials. Araqchi announced the postponement of the fourth round of talks for logistical reasons but emphasized Iran’s determination to reach an agreement that ends sanctions and ensures the peaceful nature of its nuclear program. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei confirmed that the indirect talks originally scheduled for May 3, 2025, in Rome have been rescheduled based on a proposal from the Omani Foreign Minister, with further details to be provided later.

  • Araqchi Decries Attack on Iran’s Embassy in Stockholm: A Call for Diplomatic Protection

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi condemned the recent attack on the Iranian embassy in Stockholm, emphasizing the importance of diplomatic safety. In a call with Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard, he urged swift action against those responsible and called for improved cooperation and consultations to resolve misunderstandings. The attack, which occurred on April 30, involved an individual attempting to set the embassy on fire, causing damage but no injuries. Stenergard reaffirmed Sweden’s commitment to protecting diplomatic missions and promised necessary security measures for the Iranian embassy, highlighting the need for enhanced global embassy security.

  • This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly.