Unyielding Stance: National Security and Defense Power Off the Negotiation Table
In a recent address, Iran’s Parliament Speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, reaffirmed Iran’s commitment to diplomatic engagement while firmly stating that the nation will not negotiate under pressure. This declaration comes in light of ongoing hostile policies targeting the country and the notable Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear and civilian facilities in June 2025.
During a meeting of the Permanent Committee on Political Affairs of the Asian Parliamentary Assembly (APA), Ghalibaf elaborated on the challenges faced by Iran over the past decades. He highlighted the following key points:
- Intense Hostile Campaigns: Ghalibaf described the Iranian nation as having endured one of the most organized and intense hostile campaigns in contemporary history.
- Inhumane Sanctions: He pointed out the imposition of harsh sanctions that he termed “inhumane,” which have obstructed Iran’s peaceful scientific and nuclear advancements.
- Direct Attacks: The June 2025 Israeli attack on Iran was labeled as a “cowardly” act with “explicit US involvement,” striking while diplomatic negotiations were underway.
- International Support: Ghalibaf noted that 120 countries around the world condemned the Israeli attack and expressed solidarity with the Iranian people, contrasting with some European governments that sided with the aggressor.
Ghalibaf’s remarks reflect a broader critique of Western governments, which he accused of using diplomacy as a mere tool for deception rather than as a genuine means to resolve disputes. He stated, “For them, diplomacy is not a tool for dialogue or resolving disputes, but rather an instrument for deception, buying time and applying pressure.”
The Iranian Speaker emphasized that under no circumstances will the Islamic Republic compromise its national security, defensive capabilities, or legitimate right to progress during negotiations. “We have repeatedly announced that the doors of diplomacy remain open,” he asserted. “But real diplomacy is only meaningful when it is accompanied by mutual respect and shared interests, not coercion and threats.”
In addressing broader regional issues, Ghalibaf underscored Asia’s pivotal role during a time of significant political, economic, technological, and cultural transformations. He articulated that Asia is more than just a geographic region; it is a continent characterized by deep historical, cultural, economic, and political connections among its nations.
Ghalibaf proposed that with a keen awareness of current global challenges and through collective, interest-based cooperation, Asia could present a new model of regional partnership. This approach could position Asia as a center of gravity for:
- Economic Growth: Harnessing the continent’s vast resources for development.
- Future-Oriented Innovation: Fostering technological advancements that can lead to sustainable growth.
- Global Developments: Contributing significantly to worldwide progress and stability.
According to Ghalibaf, Asia’s importance is not measured solely by its population or landmass. Instead, it is defined by:
- Intellectual Independence: The capacity for nations to think independently and develop their own solutions.
- Cultural Diversity: The rich tapestry of cultures that contribute to a more vibrant regional identity.
- Shared Determination: A collective will to pursue genuine multilateralism and cooperation among Asian nations.
In conclusion, Ghalibaf’s address serves as a reminder of Iran’s steadfastness in diplomacy, emphasizing that it will not yield to external pressures. His comments also highlight the potential of Asia to redefine its role on the global stage through cooperation, innovation, and mutual respect among its diverse nations.
This discussion illustrates the intricate dynamics of international relations and the importance of dialogue grounded in respect and shared interests, particularly in a region as vital as Asia.
