Unraveling Israel’s Role: The Growing Tensions in Sweida Explained
Protests in Sweida have reignited recently, marking a significant escalation in demonstrations against the siege imposed by the HTS regime. This unrest has further aggravated the humanitarian and economic crises affecting the region, drawing attention to the dire situation faced by the populace. These protests, which began in late July, were initially triggered by attacks from the HTS regime’s forces that resulted in civilian casualties. Activists and civilians are now rallying against what they perceive as “collective punishment” directed at over a million residents trapped in Sweida, demanding the formation of an international investigation committee to hold those responsible for the massacres accountable, as well as advocating for their “right to self-determination.”
One of the most alarming developments is the raising of the Israeli flag in Sweida, signaling a dangerous interference that aims to separate the region from Syria. The unrest in Sweida should not merely be seen as a conflict between individuals escalating into sectarian violence; rather, it represents the execution of a premeditated Israeli strategy. This region has been identified as a potential gateway for Israel to implement its vision for a “New Middle East,” a concept originally proposed by former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres.
The issues in Sweida are not new; they have persisted since the onset of the Syrian conflict in 2011. The former government attempted to foster dialogue with Druze leaders, aiming to regain control of all Syrian territories. The act of raising the Israeli flag in Sweida is perceived as a disgraceful affront to all Syrians, particularly in light of historical figures like Sultan Pasha al-Atrash, a Druze leader who famously opposed foreign interference and fought for Syrian unity.
The Druze community has historically served as a bulwark for Syria against Israeli aggression, embodying the revolutionary slogan: “Religion belongs to God, and the homeland belongs to everyone.” Sultan Pasha al-Atrash remained committed to the cause of Syria, the Golan Heights, and Palestine throughout his life, resentful of the leaders who compromised Arab rights. He was acutely aware of the ambitions of colonial powers and their divisive strategies.
Al-Atrash’s wisdom resonates even today, as he warned politicians: “Do not give up the country’s independence, for which we paid a cheap price with our lives.” He believed that the revolution persisted for twelve years because he and his allies refused to relinquish their arms. His diaries reflect his unyielding spirit: “Sultan al-Atrash cannot be bought.”
Despite the passage of time, the tactics of colonialism remain unchanged. The occupier continues to covet Syria’s resources to fulfill its own interests. As such, it is imperative to maintain a steadfast belief in the necessity of resistance, echoing al-Atrash’s sentiment that “the eye can resist the awl” in confronting colonial ambitions.
Israel’s maneuvers aim to exploit the strained relationship between the HTS-controlled government and the Druze community. There are efforts to establish a Druze entity, which could manifest as a small state in the south or an autonomous administration that maintains a federal relationship with Damascus. This initiative would involve creating an 80-kilometer deep demilitarized zone in southern Syria.
At the same time, Israel is wary of Turkey’s increasing influence in the region. Turkey’s recent actions, particularly regarding security agreements with the Syrian regime made in February 2025, which include operating the T-4 base and the Palmyra air base in Homs Governorate, have heightened tensions. This growing Turkish presence compels Israel to navigate a complex situation.
- Direct Confrontation: One possible course of action for Israel is to engage in direct confrontation with Turkey in Syria. However, this option comes with significant political and security costs, especially considering Israel’s ongoing conflict with Gaza.
- Diplomatic Engagement: The alternative is to pursue a dialogue with Turkey, which could pave the way for regional support in potential future negotiations aimed at resolving the situation in southern Syria.
In conclusion, the protests in Sweida highlight a critical moment in the ongoing struggle for the rights and dignity of its people. As the situation continues to evolve, it remains crucial for both local and international communities to pay attention to the developments and support the quest for justice and self-determination in the region.
