Riyadh's Strategic Move: Exclusion of Hariri from Lebanon's Municipal Elections

Riyadh’s Strategic Move: Exclusion of Hariri from Lebanon’s Municipal Elections

In recent developments in Lebanese politics, Saudi Arabia is attempting to further isolate former Prime Minister Saad Hariri, following a political quarantine that began over two years ago. This action comes as Hariri announced his intent to actively engage in the municipal elections scheduled for May 2025. His announcement, made during a memorial event for his father’s assassination, signals a significant moment in Lebanon’s complex political landscape.

However, Riyadh, in collaboration with Washington, is enforcing a strong influence over Lebanese affairs, particularly aiming to prevent Hariri from participating in the upcoming municipal elections in Beirut. This situation underscores the extent of foreign involvement in Lebanon’s governance.

Some key points to consider regarding this situation include:

  • Saudi Veto: The Saudi government has reportedly expanded its veto to include Al-Jama’a al-Islamiah (the Islamic Group), indicating a desire to control the composition of the municipal council.
  • Election Interference: Hariri’s exclusion from the municipal elections could also imply he will be barred from the parliamentary elections set for May 2026.
  • Failed Coalition Attempts: Former Prime Minister Najib Mikati attempted to create a coalition for a municipal council representing Beirut’s senior families and non-partisan figures, but his efforts were unsuccessful.

On the other hand, the Shiite alliance of Hezbollah and the Amal Movement has reaffirmed their long-standing partnership amid continuing hostilities and challenges, particularly concerning the reconstruction of areas devastated by recent conflicts, notably the U.S.-led Israeli aggression against Lebanon in late 2024.

Historically, Hezbollah’s Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah proposed a joint list of candidates for municipal elections back in 2010, which led to a formal agreement between Hezbollah and Amal. This agreement has since become a foundational element for their electoral strategy.

In a recent interview, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri emphasized the importance of holding the elections on schedule, declaring that any postponement is “absolutely unacceptable.” He stated:

“We see no technical, logistical, legal, political, or municipal grounds for postponing the elections, even for a single minute.”

Berri also highlighted the need for balance between Muslims and Christians in the municipal council of Beirut, urging all political parties to work towards this goal. He expressed concern about sectarian rhetoric from various political factions, particularly the Lebanese Forces, who have called for dividing the capital into eastern and western districts, reminiscent of the civil war era from 1975 to 1990.

In addition, Lebanon’s Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Latif Derian has stressed the importance of maintaining Beirut’s diversity, asserting that no Islamist party should aim to exclude the Christian population from the city.

Both President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam have reinforced the commitment to conducting municipal and mayoral elections as scheduled, warning that any delay would represent a political and constitutional setback for Lebanon.

Historically, Hariri has played a pivotal role in forming consensus lists in Beirut, especially as a leading figure within the Sunni community. As foreign powers like Washington and Riyadh continue to exert their influence over Lebanon, the question arises: what type of municipal council will emerge from this tangled web of interference?

As the political climate evolves, the upcoming elections will be crucial in determining Lebanon’s future and the role of its political leaders in navigating these challenges.

Similar Posts

  • This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly.

  • Syrian Leader Al Jolani Lands in Riyadh for High-Stakes Diplomatic Talks

    Al-Jolani, leader of the terrorist group Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), recently made his first official visit to Saudi Arabia, signaling a shift in the Syrian crisis. His discussions with Saudi officials in Damascus, including calls to lift sanctions, suggest a potential thaw in relations. Al-Jolani’s declaration as interim president of Syria until future elections has raised eyebrows, reflecting changing power dynamics. He is set to meet Turkish President Erdogan, further influencing Syria’s future. The international community remains divided on how to engage with al-Jolani’s government, as these developments could significantly impact the region’s geopolitical landscape.

  • Trump Points Finger at Ukraine Amid Ongoing Russia Conflict: A Controversial Take

    President Trump recently expressed disappointment with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy over Ukraine’s exclusion from US-Russia negotiations aimed at resolving the ongoing war. Speaking at his Mar-a-Lago resort, Trump criticized Zelenskyy for voicing discontent about not having a seat at the talks, suggesting that Ukraine could have negotiated earlier for peace. He urged Zelenskyy to hold elections and implied possible future meetings with President Putin. Zelenskyy countered, stressing the absurdity of talks occurring without Ukrainian representation, emphasizing the importance of including Ukrainian interests in any negotiations. The situation highlights complex international dynamics and the need for inclusive dialogue for lasting peace.

  • Iran Strongly Denounces Terrorist Attack in Quetta, Pakistan

    The Iranian Foreign Ministry, through spokesperson Ismail Baghaei, condemned a recent attack as a severe violation of Islamic values and human rights, expressing solidarity with the victims’ families and the Pakistani nation. Baghaei emphasized Iran’s commitment to combating terrorism and highlighted the need for enhanced regional and international cooperation to prevent such violence. His remarks reflect a broader regional concern about extremism and the importance of collective action against terrorism. The statement underscores the necessity for dialogue and long-term solutions to promote peace and stability, advocating for a unified approach to ensure safety and justice for all nations.

  • Key Breakthrough: Ceasefire Agreement Sparks Ten Major Achievements

    The recent ceasefire in Gaza allows for a critical examination of its cultural and discursive impacts. The conflict has disrupted mainstream narratives, empowering local journalists and social media to challenge official accounts, thus eroding trust in Western media. It has globalized the Palestinian cause, particularly among youth, while exposing systematic violence and legitimizing resistance against occupation. Additionally, solidarity among justice movements has intensified, bolstered by the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. The issue now holds legal significance at international courts, and a growing moral shame among Western elites highlights divisions within pro-Israel support, promoting Islamic unity for Palestine.

  • Trump-Netanyahu Summit: A Turning Point for Escalation or De-escalation?

    The recent meeting between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu has attracted significant attention amid growing tensions in West Asia. U.S. envoy Steven Witkoff was expected to attend, highlighting concerns over the lack of a cohesive U.S.-Israeli strategy. Netanyahu faces scrutiny following the October 7 events, which exposed his reliance on U.S. support. As protests escalate in the occupied Palestinian territories, both leaders grapple with complex dynamics, particularly regarding military actions against Iran. Their authoritarian agendas may clash, complicating efforts to stabilize the region. This meeting underscores the urgent need for dialogue and understanding to address ongoing conflicts and promote peace.