Qassem: 'We Won't Let Anyone Disarm Hezbollah' - A Bold Stand Against Dismantling Militias

Qassem: ‘We Won’t Let Anyone Disarm Hezbollah’ – A Bold Stand Against Dismantling Militias

In a recent address broadcasted on Al-Manar, Hezbollah Secretary General Sheikh Naim Qassem discussed critical developments in defense strategy and regional tensions. His remarks shed light on the ongoing challenges posed by Israeli occupation and the resilience of the Lebanese resistance movement.

Sheikh Qassem opened his speech by asserting that the resistance is fundamentally a response to the Israeli occupation. He emphasized, “Israel is expansionist, seeks to seize Lebanese as well as Palestinian land,” underscoring the significance of resistance in countering aggression.

Highlighting Hezbollah’s effectiveness, he stated that “Resistance stopped aggression by Israel and the US at Lebanon’s southern border.” This assertion reflects the group’s view of its role in maintaining national sovereignty and security.

According to Sheikh Qassem, “Israel did not achieve its goals in Lebanon thanks to Hezbollah resistance.” He pointed out that “Israel has carried out over 2,700 acts of aggression since the Lebanon ceasefire deal.” Despite these provocations, he claimed that Hezbollah has adhered fully to the terms of the ceasefire.

In a stark warning, Qassem noted, “Israel wants to occupy a large part of Lebanon and build settlements there.” He expressed confidence in the resistance, stating, “Lebanon’s resistance has options and is not afraid of anything.” This declaration serves to reinforce Hezbollah’s commitment to its mission despite external pressures.

Sheikh Qassem also addressed the issue of disarmament, stating, “Israel seeks resistance disarmament to weaken and occupy Lebanon.” He deemed efforts to disarm Hezbollah as “seditious” and aligning with Israeli interests. He firmly stated, “We will not allow anyone to disarm Hezbollah,” indicating a strong resolve to defend the group’s capabilities.

He further elaborated, “We will confront those who attack the resistance and those who work to disarm it just as we confronted ‘Israel’.” His statements emphasize the group’s preparedness to defend its position against both external and internal threats.

Qassem articulated the importance of Hezbollah’s arms, labeling them as “the pillar of the resistance,” which he argued “liberated the country and defended its sovereignty.” This perspective underscores the group’s belief in the necessity of armed resistance in the face of foreign intervention.

Turning to the broader regional context, Sheikh Qassem called for an end to Israeli occupation, stating, “Israel must withdraw from all Lebanese territory and stop its aggression.” He asserted that “Israeli withdrawal and halting the aggression are important steps toward engaging in a discussion on the defense strategy.” This statement indicates a willingness to engage in dialogue, provided that Israel ceases its aggressive actions.

Reaffirming Hezbollah’s stance, he declared, “Hezbollah will not surrender and it is not afraid of threats from the US and Israeli regime.” His comments reflect a broader sentiment of resistance against perceived imperialist influences in the region.

Qassem urged the Lebanese people to “stand firm in face of the US,” expressing solidarity and support. He also expressed hope for positive outcomes from US-Iran discussions, indicating an interest in regional diplomacy.

In a gesture of solidarity with Yemen, he remarked, “We salute Yemen which has been standing firm in face of the US and ‘Israel’ on behalf of the entire world,” praising the leadership of Ansarullah leader Sayyed Abdul Malik Al-Houthi. This acknowledgment highlights Hezbollah’s alignment with other resistance movements in the region.

In conclusion, Sheikh Naim Qassem’s address reiterates Hezbollah’s steadfast commitment to resistance against Israeli aggression and its determination to maintain Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The implications of his statements resonate not only within Lebanon but across the broader Middle Eastern landscape, as the struggle against occupation continues to shape regional dynamics.

Similar Posts

  • Unpacking the UK’s ‘100-Year Partnership’ with Ukraine: A Political Stunt or a Strategic Alliance?

    On January 16, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced a 100-year partnership in Kyiv, amid Ukraine’s search for steadfast allies. While the initiative is ambitious, its substance is questioned, as it lacks new financial commitments beyond existing support. The UK has provided £4 billion annually since 2022, but faces economic challenges that limit further aid. Additionally, past treaties and agreements, such as the 2020 partnership, already outline military and financial support. Critics argue the long-term agreement may be more of a political tactic than a genuine commitment, especially with changing U.S. policies and domestic financial pressures.

  • This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded…

  • Tragic Attack in Deir el-Balah: UN Staff Casualties Rise as One Killed and Five Injured

    The escalation of violence in Gaza has resulted in significant casualties, with at least 15 people reported dead from recent airstrikes after Israel resumed military operations. Reports indicate that one victim succumbed to injuries at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital, which is overwhelmed by the influx of casualties. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned that the military actions are just beginning. The ongoing conflict raises serious humanitarian concerns, as civilians face displacement and injury amid worsening conditions. Humanitarian organizations are urging global leaders to prioritize dialogue and seek peaceful resolutions to prevent further loss of life and address the escalating humanitarian crisis.

  • Indirect Talks Between Iran and US Set for Saturday, Sources Reveal

    The United States and Iran are set to begin indirect diplomatic negotiations, potentially leading to direct talks later, contingent on initial outcomes. The U.S. favors direct engagement, while Iran insists on indirect discussions due to longstanding trust issues. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian highlighted the importance of maintaining dignity and national pride in negotiations, as emphasized by Ayatollah Khamenei. The talks will involve mediators, allowing both nations to navigate their complex historical relationship without immediate pressures. Analysts are closely watching these discussions, as their outcomes could significantly impact international relations, sanctions, and security dynamics in the Middle East.

  • Tragic Loss: 65 Lives, Including Journalists, Taken in Escalating Israel-Gaza Conflict

    Two Palestinian journalists, including Al Jazeera’s Hossam Shabat, were killed in Israeli air strikes amid escalating tensions. The Israeli military has issued forced evacuation orders in northern Gaza, displacing 124,000 Palestinians and worsening the humanitarian crisis. Additionally, the Israeli army attacked a Red Cross building in Rafah, raising concerns over the safety of humanitarian facilities. The UN has reduced its international staff in Gaza following deadly strikes on personnel. In the West Bank, a Palestinian documentary co-director was attacked and arrested by Israeli forces, while a 17-year-old Palestinian died in custody, marking the first minor fatality in Israeli prisons.

  • Macron and Scholz Urge a Unified Europe as Trump Makes His Comeback

    During a recent meeting in Paris, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz underscored the importance of a “strong” Europe, coinciding with the 62nd anniversary of the Elysée Treaty. Macron highlighted the solid Franco-German relationship, while Scholz acknowledged challenges posed by the new U.S. administration, asserting that Europe would be a constructive partner. They emphasized the need for European unity, enhanced defense spending, and building industrial capabilities. Both leaders called for increased ambition and independence in addressing future challenges, reinforcing their commitment to collaboration, which is vital for the stability and strength of the continent.