Iran Condemns E3 Nations for Submitting to US Pressure on Snapback Mechanism

The recent developments in the negotiations surrounding Iran and the E3 nations highlight the complexities of international relations under the “rules-based international order.” The tensions have escalated as the E3, which includes the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, has announced plans to reimpose sanctions on Iran, raising significant concerns about the future of diplomatic dialogue.

On Friday, Baghaei expressed his views on social media platform X, stating that the actions taken by the E3 demonstrate what they consider a “credible” negotiating approach. He emphasized that the E3’s decision to invoke the re-imposition of terminated Security Council resolutions is not based on legal grounds or sound judgment but is rather a reflection of their adherence to U.S. directives. As Baghaei pointed out, even Marco Rubio acknowledged this in his press statement dated August 28, 2025.

In this context, the Iranian Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, engaged in a critical discussion with the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kajal Kallas, on Thursday night. This conversation followed the formal notification from the E3 to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) regarding their intention to reintroduce sanctions against Iran. If the UNSC does not adopt a resolution to extend the suspension of these sanctions within 30 days, the E3 will proceed with the snapback mechanism.

The snapback mechanism is a provision outlined in UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which was established in 2015 to endorse the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly referred to as the nuclear deal. The E3’s letter to the UNSC signals a significant shift in their approach towards Iran, raising numerous questions about the future of diplomatic relations.

• Background of the E3’s Decision: The E3’s move is seen as a direct response to Iran’s actions, yet it has been criticized by Iranian officials as illegal.
• Iran’s Reaction: The Iranian foreign ministry has stated that the E3’s actions will adversely affect their cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
• Diplomatic Discussions: Araghchi’s phone call with Kallas underscores the ongoing diplomatic efforts, despite rising tensions.

In his conversation with Kallas, Araghchi asserted that the E3’s snapback decision raises concerns about their true intentions toward Iran. He emphasized that the Islamic Republic is prepared to respond appropriately to any unlawful actions that threaten its national rights and interests.

Furthermore, in a letter sent to Kallas, Araghchi reiterated that the E3 countries lack the legal authority to activate the dispute resolution mechanism or to initiate the automatic reinstatement of sanctions. This statement underscores Iran’s firm stance on maintaining its rights under international law.

The E3’s formal notification to the UNSC has sparked a wave of reactions within Iran. Many officials believe that this approach undermines the spirit of the JCPOA and disrupts the fragile diplomatic framework that has been established. The Iranian government has consistently argued that the sanctions imposed by the E3 are politically motivated and do not reflect a genuine commitment to dialogue.

As tensions continue to rise, the implications for regional stability and international relations remain significant. The E3’s actions could have far-reaching consequences, not only for Iran but for the broader geopolitical landscape.

In conclusion, the ongoing situation between Iran and the E3 countries is a reminder of the challenges faced in achieving lasting peace through diplomatic means. The complexities of the “rules-based international order” and the influence of major powers play a critical role in shaping the future of negotiations and cooperation.