Hamas Set to Transfer Arms to New Palestinian State, Senior Official Confirms

Hamas Set to Transfer Arms to New Palestinian State, Senior Official Confirms

In a recent interview with Qatar’s Al Jazeera network, Abu Marzouk, a prominent figure in Hamas, emphasized the group’s commitment to the future of Gaza and the Palestinian people. He stated that Hamas is prepared to hand over its weapons to a future Palestinian state, underscoring that the fate of Gaza is a national issue that cannot be decided by Hamas alone.

Abu Marzouk articulated the group’s stance on the peace process, noting that while Hamas accepts the “main outlines” of Donald Trump’s proposal, its implementation necessitates detailed negotiations through mediators. He remarked, “Hamas will negotiate all issues related to the movement and its weapons,” indicating that discussions will encompass:

  • Peacekeeping force details
  • Operational aspects
  • Governance of Gaza

He further clarified that the arms of the resistance group would be transferred “to whoever governs Gaza within the coming Palestinian state.” In his remarks, he emphasized, “The future of our people is a national question,” urging the United States to “look positively at the future of the Palestinian people.”

Abu Marzouk also confirmed a “national agreement” to transition Gaza’s administration to independent figures who align with the Palestinian Authority. He firmly rejected any attempts to label Hamas as a terrorist organization, maintaining that it is fundamentally a “national liberation movement.”

In a significant development, Hamas has expressed approval for the release of all Israeli captives and the delivery of bodies, alongside the transfer of Gaza’s administration to a neutral Palestinian technocratic body, as part of its response to Trump’s plan. The group insists that other elements of the proposal, particularly those addressing Gaza’s future and the rights of the Palestinian people, must be collectively decided by all national factions and adhere to international law.

Palestinian sources, as reported by Anadolu, reveal that Hamas has submitted its formal response to mediators, actively seeking clarifications on various clauses within the proposal. The group has engaged in “in-depth consultations within its leadership and with Palestinian factions, mediators, and allies” before finalizing its position.

The White House plan, unveiled on September 29, outlines several key points aimed at stabilizing the region:

  1. Immediate ceasefire
  2. Reconstruction of Gaza
  3. Creation of a transitional governance mechanism to manage Gaza’s political and security affairs

This proposal seeks to establish Gaza as a “weapons-free zone,” overseen by an international body, with Trump himself directing the efforts. In a recent statement, Trump remarked that Hamas’s response indicates a willingness for “lasting peace,” calling on Israel to “immediately stop bombing Gaza so that hostages can be freed safely.”

He further noted, “This is not only about Gaza; this is about long-sought peace in the Middle East.”

Since the escalation of violence in October 2023, Israel’s ongoing bombardment and siege have tragically resulted in the deaths of nearly 66,300 Palestinians, predominantly women and children, leaving the enclave in a state of devastation. The 2.4 million residents of Gaza are currently living under a stringent blockade that has severely restricted access to food, medicine, and fuel, leading to famine-like conditions described by UN agencies as catastrophic.

Human rights organizations have consistently condemned the Israeli regime for what they characterize as collective punishment and systematic war crimes. Meanwhile, the Palestinian resistance asserts that any genuine peace must commence with the cessation of occupation, the lifting of the blockade, and the restoration of the rights of the Palestinian people.

As the situation evolves, the international community watches closely, hoping for a resolution that ensures peace and justice for all parties involved.

Similar Posts

  • Iran Asserts Its Right to Withdraw from the NPT: A Bold Move in Global Nuclear Politics

    On August 28, 2025, the UK, France, and Germany (E3) announced plans to activate the “snapback” mechanism under UN Security Council Resolution 2231, prompting Iran to denounce the move as “unjustified and illegal.” Iran has vowed to respond to protect its rights amid rising tensions over its nuclear program. Professor Hongda Fan suggests that while Iran’s potential withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is an option, it may lead to stricter sanctions. He advises Iran to engage in negotiations, clarify its national interests, and strengthen ties with Eastern nations to navigate the escalating geopolitical pressures effectively.

  • Unveiling the Destiny: Strategic Moves of Two Civilizations in the Dawn of a New Era

    Iran and China, rooted in rich cultural legacies shaped by historical exchanges and challenges, are strengthening their partnership amid a transforming global landscape. As the old order declines, both nations emphasize resilience, national dignity, and sustainable progress through independence. Their collaboration, essential for regional stability, aims to create an integrated economic ecosystem focused on energy security and technology transfer. This partnership underscores the importance of indigenous security structures over foreign intervention, positioning Iran as a geopolitical pivot in Eurasia. Together, they strive for a future where cooperation leads to stability and sustainable development, countering attempts to destabilize their roles in Asia.

  • Iran Dismisses US and Israel Allegations on Its Involvement in Syria

    Iran’s Ambassador to the UN, Amir Sa’eed Iravani, recently addressed the Security Council, rejecting U.S. and Israeli accusations of Iran destabilizing Syria. In a letter dated April 21, 2025, he emphasized Iran’s commitment to Syria’s sovereignty and condemned U.S. actions as violations under the guise of counterterrorism. Iravani criticized Israeli violations of Syrian territory, urging the Security Council to act against these breaches of international law. He also refuted claims regarding Iran’s support for Hezbollah, asserting they are fabrications meant to justify Israeli aggression. His letter highlights Iran’s unwavering stance amid ongoing geopolitical tensions in the region.

  • Hamas: Balancing Battlefield Resistance and Diplomatic Strategies

    Hamas has showcased political maturity in its response to the Trump peace plan, which includes a ceasefire, prisoner release, disarmament of Hamas, and Israel’s gradual withdrawal from Gaza. While Hamas has agreed to the ceasefire and prisoner release, it has postponed discussions on disarmament, emphasizing the need for Palestinian unity in decision-making. Recognizing itself as a liberation movement, Hamas is willing to consider transferring its arms to a future Palestinian government. As negotiations facilitated by Egypt and the U.S. begin, Hamas must assertively advocate for guarantees regarding Israel’s withdrawal to safeguard Palestinian rights amid shifting geopolitical dynamics.

  • Iran’s Diplomacy: Navigating Critical Historical Crossroads

    The year 1403 (March 2024 – March 2025) was pivotal for Iran’s foreign policy, beginning with the tragic deaths of President Ayatollah Seyyed Ebrahim Raeisi and Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian in a helicopter crash. Their loss prompted significant diplomatic changes and a crucial presidential election, focusing on whether to continue Raeisi’s “Look East” strategy and support for the Resistance Front. Despite international condolences, particularly from allies, Iran remained resolute in its resistance-driven policies. The new administration emphasized active regional diplomacy, strengthened ties with Eastern nations, and renewed economic cooperation, all while facing economic sanctions and geopolitical challenges.

  • Iran and U.S. Set for High-Stakes Indirect Talks on April 26: Expert Insights Ahead!

    Recent developments in international diplomacy reveal ongoing indirect talks between Iran and the United States, crucial for improving bilateral relations and regional stability. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei announced that expert-level talks, initially scheduled for Wednesday, have been rescheduled for April 26. This meeting will coincide with the next round of indirect negotiations between the heads of the two delegations, aiming to foster a more comprehensive dialogue. These discussions are vital in addressing the longstanding challenges in Iran-U.S. relations and enhancing cooperation in the region.