UN Chief Guterres Advocates for Peaceful Development of Iran's Nuclear Program

Hamas Denies Guterres’ Allegations of Fabricated Sexual Violence Claims

In a recent development, the Gaza-based resistance movement has issued a strong statement rejecting the report released by UN Secretary-General António Guterres on August 14. This report controversially places the group on a “blacklist” of entities accused of sexual crimes. The movement’s firm rejection and strong condemnation of the report raise significant questions about the credibility of the claims made.

The statement released by the resistance movement highlights several key points regarding their concerns with the UN’s findings:

  • Legally Invalid Step: The resistance group asserts that the inclusion in the blacklist is legally invalid and contradicts established facts.
  • Double Standards: They claim that the report reflects double standards that undermine the integrity of the international system.
  • Lack of Independent Investigation: The group argues that the report’s conclusions are not based on independent and neutral field investigations and fail to meet internationally accepted standards of proof.
  • Reliance on Fabricated Narratives: They contend that the report relies solely on politically motivated narratives from Israel, lacking any impartial investigation or contact with alleged victims.

The resistance movement emphasized that such a lack of thorough investigation constitutes a blatant violation of the professional principles outlined in relevant UN resolutions. They also pointed out that the UN report notably fails to include the Israeli regime on the list, despite substantial evidence documented by UN investigative commissions, independent international rights organizations, and special rapporteurs.

The statement elaborated on this point, stating, “[They] all prove that the occupation forces have committed systematic acts of sexual violence against Palestinian civilians, including rape and other forms of sexual assaults, as part of the genocidal war they are waging on the Gaza Strip.” This underscores the serious allegations against the Israeli military, which the resistance claims have been ignored in the UN report.

Furthermore, the resistance movement accused the UN of applying a double standard, compromising the principle of equality before international law. They described the politicization of UN mechanisms as a threat to their integrity, suggesting that these processes have been manipulated to absolve the occupation of its crimes rather than hold it accountable.

In light of these concerns, Hamas has called on the UN Secretary-General and the Security Council to take immediate action:

  • Withdrawal of the Decision: They demand the immediate withdrawal of what they consider an unjust decision.
  • Independent Investigation: The group urges the establishment of an independent and impartial international investigation, overseen by a committee of international experts, into all allegations of sexual violence related to the ongoing conflict.

The resistance movement expressed that the current situation, marked by the politicization of international justice and the inconsistent application of humanitarian law, severely undermines trust in the UN system. They warned that such double standards could encourage actual perpetrators to act with impunity, further exacerbating the plight of those living under occupation.

In conclusion, the Gaza-based resistance movement’s response to the UN Secretary-General’s report highlights critical issues regarding the integrity of international investigations and the treatment of allegations of sexual violence in conflict zones. Their call for a fair and impartial investigation reflects a broader concern for justice and accountability in a highly politicized context.

This situation continues to evolve, and as more information becomes available, the international community’s response will be crucial in addressing the grievances highlighted by the resistance group.

MNA/Press TV

Similar Posts

  • US Embassy Takeover: A Turning Point in Iran’s Struggle Against ‘Great Satan’

    Long-standing tensions between the U.S. and Iran have fostered mutual distrust, rooted in key historical events such as the 1953 U.S.-backed coup against Prime Minister Mosaddegh and the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Following the Shah’s ousting, the U.S. Embassy in Tehran was stormed by students on November 4, 1979, resulting in the hostage crisis. This takeover, justified by Ayatollah Khomeini as a response to U.S. interference, marked a significant turning point, with Khomeini labeling the U.S. the “Great Satan.” Today, the former embassy serves as a museum, and November 4 is commemorated annually as Student Day in Iran, emphasizing resistance against U.S. policies.

  • Sanaa Calls the Shots: A Game-Changing Decision Beyond Washington’s Reach

    The Middle East is experiencing a significant geopolitical shift, particularly in Yemen, where the Ansarallah movement has emerged as a key player, challenging Western dominance. Recent military developments have revealed that once secondary forces are now crucial in the regional equation. Despite accusations of Iranian support, Yemen has demonstrated remarkable military self-sufficiency, developing its capabilities amid a blockade. This evolution underscores the disconnect between U.S. policies and the realities on the ground. Ansarallah’s actions highlight its independence and the rising influence of local movements, necessitating a reevaluation of strategies by global powers as regional dynamics continue to change.

  • Kurdish Protests Erupt in Iran Over Death Sentences for Two Women: A Cry for Justice

    On Wednesday, businesses in several Kurdish cities in Iran went on strike in protest of the impending death sentences for two female political prisoners, Pakhshan Azizi and Varishe Moradi. The strike, organized by six Kurdish groups, aimed to raise awareness about human rights violations in the region. Social media showcased closed shops in cities like Sanandaj and Mahabad. Moradi was sentenced for “armed rebellion,” while Azizi’s sentence included prison time for alleged PJAK membership. Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International, condemned the sentences, highlighting the broader issue of state repression and the high number of political prisoners facing execution in Iran.

  • Hamas Frees All 20 Israeli Hostages in Unprecedented Release

    Hamas has released all 20 living Israeli captives as part of a ceasefire deal, marking a crucial step in the ongoing conflict. This agreement comes amid rising tensions and humanitarian crises, with 26 deceased captives expected to be released soon. The situation in Gaza remains dire, with over 67,806 fatalities and 170,066 injuries reported since October 2023. Humanitarian aid is slowly arriving, providing some support to those affected. As both sides await the release of nearly 2,000 Palestinian detainees, there is cautious optimism for future peace talks, though significant challenges remain in achieving lasting resolution.

  • This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded with more detailed information…

  • Iran Hits Back at US Allegations in UN Security Council Showdown

    In a recent U.N. address, Iran’s Ambassador Majid Takht Ravani rejected accusations from the U.S. and Israel, calling them unfounded and politically motivated. His letter to U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres emphasized that these claims distract from the humanitarian crisis in Gaza caused by Israel’s actions against Palestinians. Ravani argued that U.S. support for Israel fosters a culture of impunity for its alleged war crimes and criticized the double standards in nuclear proliferation discussions. He urged the international community to hold Israel accountable and reassess U.S. support, highlighting the need for a more balanced narrative in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.