Grossi Denies Claims: No Evidence of Iran’s Arms Pursuit in Reports

In a recent online interview with Colombian media, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi discussed the ongoing challenges surrounding Iran’s nuclear program. His insights shed light on the complexities of the relationship between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), particularly in light of recent developments at the Bushehr reactor.

Grossi addressed the heightened criticism from Iran, stating that following extended negotiations, IAEA inspectors were able to return to Iran. The inspectors’ first destination was the Bushehr reactor, marking a crucial step in resuming inspections. However, crucial technical agreements still need to be finalized to ensure comprehensive access to all relevant sites, especially those impacted by US-Israeli attacks. Grossi emphasized that “there is still nuclear material under the rubble of these sites, and this material remains a significant concern.”

Further commenting on the IAEA’s efforts, Grossi noted that “the IAEA is working to restore contacts with Iran that were severed due to military actions.” He acknowledged the transient nature of military strikes, asserting that while they may have immediate effects, “such attacks will not eliminate Iran’s nuclear program.” Grossi firmly rejected any notion that the IAEA’s reports provided the United States with justification for military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities. He clarified that the reports merely reflected the current state of Iran’s nuclear program without presenting new information that would warrant such drastic measures.

Addressing concerns about nuclear weapon development, Grossi stated, “my reports have consistently indicated that Iran had no intentions of building nuclear weapons, and this remains unchanged.” He emphasized that anyone interpreting the reports as a justification for conflict is, in his view, “completely mistaken.”

In a related development, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi expressed strong sentiments regarding the role of European nations in the ongoing diplomatic efforts to resolve Iran’s nuclear challenges. He criticized the Europeans for undermining their position in the negotiation process, suggesting they will now play a “diminished” role in future talks.

Araghchi’s comments followed the conclusion of the so-called snapback process initiated by the E3 nations—namely the UK, Germany, and France—aimed at reinstating UN sanctions against Iran. Speaking to reporters after a meeting with ambassadors and heads of foreign missions in Tehran, he remarked that the European trio’s attempt to leverage the snapback mechanism “did not resolve any issues.” Instead, it has complicated diplomatic relations further.

The Iranian Foreign Minister was also questioned about the recent agreement between Iran and the IAEA, which was signed in Cairo on September 9, aimed at resuming cooperation. He indicated that the agreement can no longer serve as a foundation for Iran’s collaboration with the IAEA. “Iran will soon announce its new decision on how cooperation with the UN’s atomic watchdog will proceed,” he stated, highlighting the evolving dynamics of the situation.

As the discussions between Iran and the IAEA continue, several key points remain at the forefront of international concern:

• Resumption of Inspections: The return of IAEA inspectors to Iran, particularly to the Bushehr reactor, is a pivotal moment in ongoing negotiations.
• Access to Sites: The necessity of reaching a technical agreement for access to all relevant sites, including those affected by military attacks, is crucial.
• Impact of Military Action: Grossi’s assertion that military strikes do not dismantle Iran’s nuclear ambitions underlines the futility of aggressive tactics.
• European Role in Diplomacy: Araghchi’s comments reflect a shift in the perceived influence of European nations following the snapback process.
• Future Cooperation with IAEA: Iran’s forthcoming announcement regarding cooperation with the IAEA signals a significant change in approach.

The ongoing dialogue surrounding Iran’s nuclear program remains complex, as both the IAEA and Iran navigate through diplomatic challenges and the ramifications of international actions. The world watches closely as developments unfold, seeking a peaceful resolution to an intricate issue that has far-reaching implications for global security.