E3 Lacks Legal and Moral Authority to Activate Snapback Mechanism: Implications Explored

E3 Lacks Legal and Moral Authority to Activate Snapback Mechanism

In a significant development regarding Iran’s nuclear program, Russia’s Permanent Representative to International Organizations in Vienna, Mikhail Ulyanov, shared critical insights in an exclusive interview with Press TV. His remarks were particularly focused on the upcoming IAEA Board of Governors meeting and the implications of recent snapback sanctions initiated by the E3 countries. This situation underscores the complexities of international diplomacy concerning nuclear agreements.

Ulyanov emphasized that the initiation of the snapback mechanism by three European states—France, Germany, and the United Kingdom—was not a mere coincidence. He stated, “It was not occasional that the snapback mechanism was launched by three European states who formally still remain participants in the JCPOA. They don’t have a legal, procedural, or even moral right to do that because they are violators.”

He elaborated on the violations committed by the E3 and the United States, asserting that their actions have undermined the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) significantly. Ulyanov cited the International Court of Justice’s 1971 legal opinion, which indicates that a party that breaches an agreement forfeits its right to blame another party for similar violations. He stated, “They violated the JCPOA very significantly as well as Resolution 2231.”

  • Politicization of IAEA Activities: Ulyanov pointed out that the European trio and the U.S. have been instrumental in politicizing the IAEA’s operations. He noted a specific instance where discussions between the IAEA Secretariat and Iran were progressing positively, only to be disrupted by the E3’s sudden trigger of the snapback mechanism.
  • Repeated Disruptions: He described the behavior of European nations towards Iran’s nuclear dossier as “irrational and inexplicable.” Ulyanov stated, “The Europeans time and again create problems in the sphere that relates to the nuclear dossier of Iran. It’s very irrational. It’s very strange.”

According to Ulyanov, the dialogue within the IAEA’s Board of Governors has shifted from technical discussions to a more politicized environment, particularly concerning Iran. He also highlighted the absence of U.S. involvement in the snapback process, noting that President Trump had withdrawn from the JCPOA and President Biden had not sought to rejoin the agreement.

Furthermore, Ulyanov reiterated that the E3 countries lack the “legal, procedural, or even moral right” to invoke the snapback mechanism, as they themselves are in violation of the agreement. He stated, “They had significantly violated the JCPOA as well as Resolution 2231.”

He raised concerns regarding the West’s exit strategy in light of the snapback mechanism and the anticipated re-imposition of all UN Security Council sanctions by the end of September. Ulyanov emphasized Russia’s commitment to pursuing diplomatic solutions and fostering collective discussions involving all JCPOA participants.

Moreover, Ulyanov revealed that Russia and China have collaborated on a draft resolution aimed at extending Resolution 2231 and the JCPOA for an additional six months. This initiative is designed to allow more time for diplomatic efforts, thereby avoiding the necessity of snapback sanctions.

He also expressed apprehension about the potential implications of Iran’s withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), highlighting that Iran is one of the most inspected nations globally. Ulyanov noted, “The extensive inspections carried out in the country” serve as a testament to its compliance with international regulations.

Ulyanov concurred with the viewpoint that the nuclear issue has increasingly become a geopolitical tool aimed at containing Iran, Russia, and China. He remarked on the growing politicization and confrontational dynamics within international organizations such as the UN and IAEA, contrasting this with previous years characterized by cooperation and consensus.

In his closing remarks, Ulyanov expressed regret over the deterioration of the ‘Vienna spirit’ in international organizations, attributing this shift to rising geopolitical tensions. He underscored Russia’s ongoing efforts to counterbalance Western dominance in multilateral forums, affirming the need for unity and collaboration among all parties involved.

This interview sheds light on the intricate dynamics surrounding Iran’s nuclear program and the broader geopolitical landscape, illustrating the challenges of achieving consensus in a divided international community.

As discussions continue, the upcoming IAEA Board of Governors meeting is expected to play a pivotal role in shaping the future of diplomatic relations concerning Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Source: MNA/Press TV

Similar Posts

  • Iran Dismisses US and Israel Allegations on Its Involvement in Syria

    Iran’s Ambassador to the UN, Amir Sa’eed Iravani, recently addressed the Security Council, rejecting U.S. and Israeli accusations of Iran destabilizing Syria. In a letter dated April 21, 2025, he emphasized Iran’s commitment to Syria’s sovereignty and condemned U.S. actions as violations under the guise of counterterrorism. Iravani criticized Israeli violations of Syrian territory, urging the Security Council to act against these breaches of international law. He also refuted claims regarding Iran’s support for Hezbollah, asserting they are fabrications meant to justify Israeli aggression. His letter highlights Iran’s unwavering stance amid ongoing geopolitical tensions in the region.

  • Iran’s Zarif: Lifting Sanctions, Not U.S. Negotiations, is Key to Solving Iran’s Challenges

    Iranian Vice-President Mohammad Javad Zarif emphasized the Foreign Ministry’s efforts to strengthen ties with China, Africa, Russia, and neighboring nations, expressing skepticism towards the U.S. role in Iran’s foreign relations. He stated that the government aims to dismantle barriers to diplomatic engagement, reaffirming Iran’s commitment to avoiding nuclear weapons in light of a religious decree from Ayatollah Khamenei. Zarif criticized the impact of FATF regulations on international exchanges and mentioned ongoing discussions related to the Palermo Convention and terrorism. He also announced an upcoming visit to Iraq for a seminar, highlighting Iran’s focus on international collaboration amidst sanctions and regulatory challenges.

  • Hamas Calls Out Israel: Starvation as a Weapon Deemed a War Crime

    The Islamic Resistance Movement, or Hamas, has condemned Israel’s use of starvation against Gaza’s population, calling it a war crime and a violation of international law. They highlighted a severe siege lasting 60 days that obstructs essential supplies, leading to a humanitarian crisis with halted access to food, water, and medicine. The ongoing bombardment further exacerbates the famine, contributing to a catastrophic situation. Hamas referred to comments by UNRWA’s Commissioner-General about Israeli forces using agency employees as human shields, denouncing the brutality of the Israeli regime. They urged global action to support Gaza and uphold humanitarian values.

  • Syrians Rally Against Alawite Massacres and Israeli Regime: A Call for Justice

    Recent protests have erupted in Syria, particularly in Suweida, in response to the mass killings of Alawites and opposition to Israeli interference. Hundreds, including women and children, gathered to demand the withdrawal of militants from the ruling Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) regime and to open humanitarian corridors. Demonstrators condemned HTS’s blockade and called for an international inquiry into violence, criticizing HTS’s local investigation. Protests also spread to Dara’a and Damascus, reflecting broader discontent over foreign intervention and domestic repression. The situation underscores a growing desire for change among Syrians amid ongoing violence and instability.

  • Iran Stands Firm: Araghchi Declares No Negotiations Under Threats

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that the “maximum pressure” strategy and related resolutions have failed against Iran, asserting that Tehran will not negotiate under threats. During a press conference, he outlined key foreign policy principles: no negotiations under pressure, the importance of dignity in diplomacy, and the need for actions rather than words from the U.S. administration. He criticized a recent Presidential Memorandum by President Trump aimed at reinstating pressure on Iran, emphasizing that it highlights the U.S. commitment to this strategy following its withdrawal from the nuclear agreement. Trump’s openness to negotiate a new deal was also noted.

  • Rising Voices Against Authoritarianism: ‘No Kings’ Protests Challenge Trump’s Governance

    Recent protests in the U.S. reflect a strong backlash against the erosion of democratic norms and institutional checks, exacerbated by former President Donald Trump’s political strategies. His second term has intensified political polarization, racial tensions, and diminished public trust in institutions. Economic inequality and disillusionment with political elites fuel both his support base and protests against him. The “No Kings” movement symbolizes a critical point in American democracy, driven by citizens’ frustrations with institutional failures to check Trump’s power. Critics warn that Trump’s tactics may signal a shift towards authoritarianism, challenging the future of U.S. democracy and governance.