Deputy FM Engages Chinese Media on Critical Iran Issues: A Dialogue on Key Concerns

In a significant diplomatic move, Saeed Khatibzadeh, an advisor to Iran’s foreign minister and president of the Office of Political and International Studies (IPIS), has made his first official visit to China following the recent US-Israeli hostilities targeting Iran in June. During his visit, he participated in an in-depth interview with China’s Phoenix Television, covering critical topics including nuclear policy, national interests, and bilateral relations.

The following is a detailed transcript of that enlightening interview:

Iran’s Stance on Escalation and Conflict

As the conversation commenced, Khatibzadeh was asked about the potential for further escalation of the conflict in the region. He asserted, “Escalation is always possible when the other side of the aisle is Israel and the United States. Iran is for peace. Iran has always been for peace.” He emphasized that Iran has not initiated any wars for centuries and considers itself a stabilizing force in the Middle East.

Khatibzadeh highlighted the following points regarding the current geopolitical landscape:

• Historical Context: Iran has existed for millennia and aims to continue its legacy as a civilizational state.
• Israeli Actions: The Israeli government’s actions are perceived as obstacles to establishing a Palestinian state.
• Regional Awareness: There is a growing recognition in the Middle East of the threats posed by Israel and the United States.

Concerns Over Military Confrontation

When asked about the fears of a broader military confrontation in the Middle East, Khatibzadeh reiterated Iran’s commitment to peace. He stated, “We are doing all we can to prevent that,” suggesting that Iran has actively sought to halt aggression even before it escalated. He added that while full-scale war is always a possibility, it is not a desirable outcome.

Key insights from this section included:

• Palestinian Issue: Khatibzadeh identified the Palestinian situation as the core issue contributing to regional instability.
• Desire for Stability: Iran, along with China and other responsible nations, is committed to preventing further escalation.

Addressing Vulnerabilities in Intelligence

The discussion also touched upon the recent assassinations of Iranian military and nuclear scientists, prompting questions about Iran’s intelligence vulnerabilities. Khatibzadeh stated, “You have to look at Israel as a terrorist cult,” acknowledging their historical pattern of targeted killings as a tactic.

He pointed out that the Israeli operations are not isolated, stating that they often involve collaboration with Western intelligence agencies. He emphasized:

• Intelligence Coordination: Iran is enhancing its strategies to counteract these threats.
• Security Challenges: Conducting security operations in a vast country like Iran presents significant challenges.

Human Rights Claims and International Law

In response to Western media reports alleging human rights concerns regarding recent arrests, Khatibzadeh dismissed these claims as hypocritical. He argued, “Human rights coming from the mouths of Westerners and Europeans! What a bitter joke.” He emphasized that Western nations have lost moral authority due to their complicity in global conflicts.

Key points from his response included:

• International Law Violations: Khatibzadeh accused the U.S. of violating international law by attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities without condemnation.
• Commitment to Rights: Iran’s dedication to human rights is framed as a matter of principle, distinct from Western practices.

Strategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz

As speculation grows regarding Iran’s potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz amid escalating tensions, Khatibzadeh asserted the importance of stability in this critical waterway. He stated, “Iran is the anchor of stability and the guarantor of this free shipment.”

He further explained:

• Restraint in Conflict: Iran has exhibited considerable restraint despite provocations.
• Existential Threats: Should the U.S. pose an existential threat, Iran would reconsider its measured approach.

Nuclear Enrichment and Negotiations

The interview also addressed Iran’s nuclear program, particularly the recent IAEA report indicating that Iran possesses approximately 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%. Khatibzadeh clarified that this enrichment is under IAEA supervision and is intended for civilian purposes.

He elaborated on Iran’s commitment to the JCPOA nuclear agreement, stating:

• Reversible Actions: Iran’s nuclear measures can be reversed, contingent on meaningful negotiations.
• Right to Enrich: He stressed that Iran’s enrichment activities are a right, not a bargaining chip.

Future Negotiations

Reflecting on the stalled negotiations, Khatibzadeh expressed cautious optimism but underscored the necessity for assurances before resuming talks. He noted, “The other side has shown to everybody that is untrustworthy,” emphasizing that any future negotiations would require a fundamental shift in U.S. policy.

In summary, Saeed Khatibzadeh’s visit to China and his extensive interview shed light on Iran’s position regarding regional tensions, its nuclear ambitions, and the complex dynamics of international relations. As Iran navigates these challenges, its commitment to peace and regional stability remains a central theme.