Archaeologist Dismisses Claims of Seljuk Palace Discovery in Kamar-Zarrin Passage

In the realm of archaeology, accurate findings are crucial for understanding our past. Recently, prominent archaeologist Alireza Jafari-Zand has brought attention to the Kamar-Zarrin site in Isfahan, asserting that there is no evidence of a Seljuk palace in the area. His statements highlight the importance of scientific rigor in archaeological excavations and express concern over the ongoing excavation processes at this historically significant location.

According to a report by Mehr News Agency, Jafari-Zand has voiced his disappointment over the direction of the second phase of excavations in the Kamar-Zarrin passage. He is known for his pivotal role in discovering this site and for his efforts to protect it from destruction by raising public awareness.

“If I had known in advance that such a process would occur in the Kamar-Zarrin site, I would have preferred to remain silent and allow this area to remain under asphalt,” Jafari-Zand stated. He emphasized the need for a skilled team of archaeologists who possess a deep understanding of Isfahan’s historical context to conduct thorough examinations.

Jafari-Zand expressed his concerns regarding the current excavation efforts, stating that they are misdirected. “The news that I receive from the second phase of excavations is more useful for treasure hunters than for science and archaeology,” he lamented. This statement underscores the potential for archaeological discoveries to be misused if not conducted by qualified professionals.

In his remarks, Jafari-Zand made it clear that there is no Seljuk palace at the Kamar-Zarrin passage. He stated, “The Seljuk palace is not located in the Kamar-Zarrin passage and has no connection with this place.” He pointed out that only a few Safavid coins have been found at the site, which he believes hold little significance for scientific exploration.

The true purpose of archaeology, according to Jafari-Zand, is to illuminate our obscure history rather than provide leads for smugglers. He elaborated, “The goal of archaeology is to shed light on our dark history, not to provide clues to smugglers.” This perspective emphasizes the ethical responsibilities of archaeologists in safeguarding cultural heritage.

Furthermore, Jafari-Zand discussed the historical context of the Kamar-Zarrin Mosque, which has undergone restoration. He explained that its foundation dates back to the Buyid period and argued that it is unlikely for Seljuk-era works to have been constructed atop Buyid foundations. He stated, “If we had works of the Seljuk period, there should have been Al-Buyid works underneath.”

In his critique of the excavation process, Jafari-Zand noted that he had initially warned that this site should be excavated by an expert archaeologist. Unfortunately, he feels that these warnings were not heeded. “It has become a place for internships for archaeology students and people who have no expertise in this field,” he lamented. This situation raises questions about the qualifications of those conducting the excavations and the methodologies employed.

In summary, the situation at the Kamar-Zarrin site highlights serious concerns regarding the current state of archaeological practices in Iran. Jafari-Zand’s insights serve as a reminder of the importance of conducting thorough, scientifically-based excavations led by qualified professionals. As we continue to explore our past, it is vital to prioritize the integrity of archaeological findings and the preservation of historical sites.

• Key Concerns Raised:
  • No evidence of a Seljuk palace in Kamar-Zarrin.
  • Current excavation processes seem to favor treasure hunters over scientific discovery.
  • Significant historical context tied to the Buyid period and the mosque’s foundation.
• Ethical Responsibilities:
  • Archaeologists must prioritize the protection of cultural heritage.
  • Excavations should be led by experienced professionals.

As discussions around the Kamar-Zarrin site continue, the archaeological community must remain vigilant in ensuring that excavations contribute positively to our understanding of history rather than detract from it.