Ulyanov Reveals: West Abandoned JCPOA Revival Talks in 2022!

Ulyanov Reveals: West Abandoned JCPOA Revival Talks in 2022!

Mikhail Ulyanov, a prominent figure in discussions surrounding the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), has been instrumental in the ongoing negotiations to restore this pivotal nuclear agreement. As Russia’s Permanent Representative to international organizations in Vienna, Ulyanov has actively participated in multiple rounds of negotiations aimed at revitalizing the JCPOA after the United States withdrew in 2018 and reimposed sanctions on Iran.

In a recent interview with the Tehran Times, Ulyanov highlighted that the remaining signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal—namely Iran, Russia, China, France, Germany, and Britain—were on the brink of reaching an agreement to revive the pact before European nations coordinated with Washington to exit the discussions in 2022. Ulyanov emphasized that the revival of the JCPOA hinges significantly on the actions of the United States, rather than the Europeans, who he believes are not the primary decision-makers in this context.

While Ulyanov refrained from detailing the reasons behind the West’s abrupt withdrawal from negotiations, he pointed out that this departure coincided with a period of domestic unrest and protests in Iran.

Below is the complete text of Ulyanov’s interview with the Tehran Times:

What is the current status of negotiations on the JCPOA?

The JCPOA negotiations halted in 2022, just as they were nearing completion. Only a few provisions remained unresolved. Western nations, including the United States, Germany, France, and the UK, chose to abandon the finalization of the agreement, while Russia, Iran, and China were prepared to proceed.

Recently, there have been indications of informal dialogue resuming between Iranian representatives and political directors from Germany, France, and the UK, as well as representatives of the European External Action Service, who previously coordinated JCPOA negotiations. However, these discussions are preliminary and do not reflect formal negotiations. It is evident that European countries are not in a position to lead this process.

Do you think Russia has played a role in facilitating a successful outcome?

During the 2021–2022 negotiations aimed at restoring the JCPOA, Russia played a significant role. We made extensive efforts to achieve a positive outcome. Based on feedback, all participants—including Iran, China, the E3, the U.S., and the EU—acknowledged Russia’s contributions positively. We were able to propose several compromise solutions that received unanimous support and helped advance the negotiations.

What are the key challenges remaining in reviving the Iran nuclear deal?

The foremost challenge is the unwillingness of Western countries to resume negotiations at this time. Many Western nations have become entangled in their political agendas, failing to consider the legitimate requests and proposals from Iran. They often resort to politicizing the issue and engage in actions that are not only provocative but completely irrelevant to the negotiations. A clear example of this behavior is their actions at the IAEA Board of Governors in Vienna, which included politically charged anti-Iran resolutions.

What are the implications of the JCPOA for regional security and stability?

The JCPOA had a positive impact on regional security and stability from 2015 to 2018, prior to the U.S. withdrawal. A timely and full resumption of the JCPOA could indeed contribute to restoring stability in the region.

Are there any potential avenues for future cooperation on the issue?

Currently, no clear answers exist regarding future cooperation. The U.S. position remains ambiguous, particularly concerning whether it will recognize that its withdrawal from the JCPOA and the imposition of a ‘maximum pressure’ campaign produced outcomes contrary to its expectations. It is uncertain if the White House is prepared to pursue a political solution that balances interests, which is essential for achieving positive results. We may anticipate greater clarity within the next 2-3 months. Additionally, it is crucial to acknowledge that October 18, 2025, marks the expiration date for the JCPOA and the UN Security Council Resolution 2231 timelines.

The implications of Ulyanov’s insights reflect the complex dynamics at play in international relations concerning the JCPOA. The ongoing negotiations and the political landscape surrounding them remain subjects of keen interest for global observers.

In conclusion, the future of the JCPOA and its potential revival depends heavily on diplomatic engagements and the willingness of the involved parties to navigate their political agendas towards a common goal. The next few months will be critical in determining whether a renewed commitment to the JCPOA can be forged, bringing stability to both Iran and the broader region.

Similar Posts

  • Iran Asserts Unwavering Right to Peaceful Nuclear Energy, Says Araqchi

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi reaffirmed Iran’s non-negotiable right to peaceful nuclear energy amid ongoing discussions about its nuclear program. In a call with Turkish counterpart Hakan Fidan, Araqchi updated him on indirect talks with the U.S. and a recent meeting with France, Britain, and Germany. He stressed the importance of respect for Iran’s rights under the Non-Proliferation Treaty and indicated Iran’s willingness to engage in constructive dialogue if genuine political will is shown by the U.S. Fidan praised Iran’s diplomatic efforts and offered Turkey’s support in advancing the negotiations.

  • Unveiling ‘I’ll Stay with You for Good’: A Powerful Journey Through the Sacred Defense

    Maryam Erfanian’s memoir, “I’ll Stay with You for Good,” is a poignant exploration of love, sacrifice, and resilience during the Iran-Iraq War. Spanning 274 pages, the first-person narrative intertwines personal experiences with oral literature, chronicling Maryam’s enduring relationship with her husband, wartime commander Akbar Nejati. The memoir highlights themes of emotional trials, spiritual connection, family dynamics, and the often-overlooked roles of women in wartime. Through rich anecdotes and photographs, Maryam reflects on identity, healing, and the sacrifices made during conflict, offering a profound understanding of the emotional and spiritual dimensions faced by military families.

  • Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Slams U.S. Sanctions as New Indirect Talks Loom

    Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei criticized new U.S. sanctions, claiming they undermine diplomatic efforts between Iran and the U.S. Announced before the fifth round of indirect talks, these sanctions raise doubts about Washington’s commitment to diplomacy. Baqaei condemned the sanctions as unlawful and inhumane, particularly their impact on the construction sector, stating they violate human rights and hinder Iran’s development. He expressed concerns that the sanctions, coinciding with ongoing negotiations, question America’s seriousness in seeking diplomatic solutions. Baqaei affirmed the Iranian people’s resilience against such measures, indicating significant implications for regional stability and international relations.

  • Iran and Afghanistan Execute High-Stakes Prisoner Swap at Milak Border Crossing

    Iran and Afghanistan have successfully executed a prisoner exchange at the Milak border crossing, enhancing diplomatic relations and addressing humanitarian issues. Nearly 200 Afghan detainees from Iranian prisons were returned to Afghanistan, while two Iranian citizens were repatriated to Iran. This exchange, facilitated by judicial and law enforcement officials from both nations, underscores collaborative efforts to strengthen ties. Iran’s Deputy Justice Minister noted that over 4,500 foreign nationals have been returned to their countries, reflecting Iran’s commitment to resolving detainee situations and improving international relations. This development is seen as a significant step towards future cooperation.

  • This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly.

  • Rising Tensions: Sectarian Rhetoric and US Relations Spark Controversy in State Media

    Iran’s state-run television is facing backlash from senior clerics and political figures for inflammatory religious commentary and biased coverage of U.S. negotiations. Moderate cleric Rasoul Montajabnia criticized the influence of a fundamentalist group in state media, particularly after a broadcast insulted Sunni Muslims. Despite an apology and investigation from IRIB, many clerics deemed this insufficient. Criticism has also come from hardline outlets, highlighting a rift in Iran’s political landscape. The head of IRIB, appointed by the Supreme Leader, faces scrutiny regarding editorial independence. This ongoing controversy underscores the complex relationship between religion, politics, and media in Iran.