Unpacking the Truth: 'Snapback' Is a Fabricated Term Not in the JCPOA Text

Unpacking the Truth: ‘Snapback’ Is a Fabricated Term Not in the JCPOA Text

In a recent address at Razavi University of Islamic Sciences in Mashhad, Iranian diplomat Esmaeil Baghaei took a firm stance against the claims made regarding the snapback mechanism of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The discussion highlighted key aspects of the ongoing tensions surrounding Iran’s nuclear program and the international community’s response.

Baghaei emphasized that many of the statements made by Wendy Sherman concerning the snapback mechanism were inaccurate. He stated, “The text of the JCPOA is clear and straightforward,” and firmly rejected the notion that Iran had been cautioned about the snapback mechanism. This statement comes in light of recent events wherein Britain, France, and Germany activated the mechanism on August 28, initiating a 30-day process to reinstate all UN sanctions against Iran.

Despite attempts by Russia and China to maintain diplomatic relations, the UN Security Council was unable to reach a consensus by September 26. Subsequently, the E3 nations along with the United States proclaimed the reinstatement of sanctions, urging all UN member states to comply.

During his address, Baghaei noted the prevailing atmosphere of mutual distrust that characterized the JCPOA negotiations, stating, “The other side did not trust us, and we did not trust them either.” He further clarified, “Some claim that the snapback mechanism was imposed on us, but that is completely untrue.”

Baghaei elaborated on the guarantees surrounding Iran’s nuclear assets, indicating that while Iran fulfilled its obligations in good faith, the other parties did not reciprocate that trust. He pointed out that the other side sought assurances that if Iran were to violate its commitments, the resolutions could be reinstated.

“According to Baghaei, Resolution 2231 has effectively concluded based on legal and logical reasoning, yet Western parties insist on its continued enforcement,” he added. This development culminated in Iran’s announcement on Saturday regarding the cessation of the JCPOA and all UN restrictions on its nuclear program, which followed the expiration of Security Council resolution 2231 that had endorsed the nuclear agreement.

Baghaei mentioned that Iran’s nuclear file is now closed and should be managed under standard international oversight. He further highlighted the support from two permanent members of the UN Security Council and nations from the Non-Aligned Movement, opposing the Western interpretation of the situation. This opposition, he argued, underscores “the importance and greatness of our country and our diplomatic capabilities.”

In addition to addressing the JCPOA, Baghaei condemned the United States’ approach to international relations. He stated, “America’s bullying behavior has disrupted international relations. Even renaming the US Department of Defense to the Department of War would better reflect its real conduct.”

Baghaei asserted that the US’s aggressive unilateralism poses a significant threat to global peace and security, fostering a dangerous precedent in international relations. He noted that through various tactics, including tariff wars, Washington aims to impose dominance through coercion.

  • Recent Diplomacy: The failure of the UN Security Council to reach a consensus has led to the reinstatement of sanctions against Iran.
  • Mutual Distrust: Baghaei emphasized the lack of trust during the JCPOA negotiations, affecting outcomes.
  • Resolution 2231: This resolution has been declared effectively concluded by Iran, despite Western insistence on its enforcement.
  • US Behavior: Baghaei criticized the US for its bullying tactics and unilateralism in international affairs.

In conclusion, Baghaei’s remarks reflect a broader narrative concerning Iran’s position in the global arena and its commitment to its nuclear program. As the geopolitical landscape continues to evolve, the implications of these statements may have significant ramifications for future diplomatic engagements.

Similar Posts

  • President Pezeshkian Slams Western Double Standards in Humanities Critique

    In a recent speech, President Masoud Pezeshkian criticized Western nations for their hypocrisy regarding humanitarian values. Speaking during Red Crescent Week, he highlighted the contradiction between their advocacy for democracy and their involvement in violence, particularly against civilians. Pezeshkian condemned the bombing of innocents, questioning the morality of those responsible and the silence of international organizations, especially concerning Israeli actions. He expressed disillusionment with the disconnect between rhetoric and reality, asserting that the brutality of these nations surpasses even the most vicious animals. Pezeshkian called for a reevaluation of global responses to humanitarian crises.

  • Ukraine’s NATO Ambitions Shattered: EU PM Declares Membership Impossible

    Kyiv seeks security guarantees amid ceasefire discussions with Moscow, emphasizing NATO membership as essential for protection. However, Moscow views Ukraine’s NATO aspirations as a core issue. Slovakia’s Prime Minister Robert Fico opposes military aid to Ukraine and advocates for renewed peace talks, stating, “Ukraine will never be in NATO.” He criticizes President Zelensky for rejecting ceasefire proposals and accuses the West of prolonging the conflict for geopolitical gain. Fico’s government, diverging from mainstream EU positions, supports ceasefire initiatives and offers Slovakia as a venue for peace talks, highlighting the urgent need for dialogue amidst the ongoing crisis.

  • Qatar’s Emir Makes Historic Visit to Tehran: Strengthening Bilateral Ties

    The Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, has arrived in Tehran for high-level talks aimed at strengthening diplomatic relations with Iran. Welcomed by Iran’s Energy Minister, Sheikh Al Thani’s visit includes meetings with President Masoud Pezeshkian and other officials, culminating in an official ceremony at Saadabad Palace. This visit follows Pezeshkian’s trip to Qatar in October, where both leaders signed cooperation agreements to enhance trade, cultural exchanges, and educational collaboration. The discussions aim to solidify partnerships and promote regional stability, benefiting both nations and their populations.

  • Unpacking Silence: Why Erdogan and Jolani Are Quiet Amidst Israel’s Attacks

    Israeli military operations in Syria have intensified since mid-2025, with at least six major attacks, including airstrikes and ground assaults, aimed at countering Iranian influence and preventing weapon transfers. This escalation has left Syria grappling with security challenges, as local factions, including Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, struggle amid external threats. Turkey, while publicly opposing Israel, has shown a passive stance, potentially indicating political coordination based on shared interests. The presence of U.S. envoy Tom Barrack complicates the situation, as Israel expands its control in the Golan Heights. Overall, Syria’s instability continues to deepen amid these ongoing conflicts.

  • Iran Confirms Media Ban on Port Blast Coverage Amid Growing Threat of Prosecution

    The Iranian government has imposed a media ban on coverage of a devastating explosion at Rajaei port in Bandar Abbas, resulting in at least 70 deaths and over 1,000 injuries. This decision, confirmed by the judiciary, aims to maintain a “single voice” across state institutions, according to government spokeswoman Fatemeh Mohajerani. However, it raises significant concerns about press freedom and transparency. Journalists face warnings against reporting, with legal actions initiated against those who violate the ban. Critics argue this may conceal a higher death toll or the explosion’s true cause, highlighting the challenges to free expression in Iran.

  • Empowering Afghans: Shaping Afghanistan’s Future Together

    In a recent UN Security Council briefing, Iranian Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani emphasized that Afghanistan’s future governance must be determined by its own people, rejecting external solutions as unsustainable. He expressed Iran’s sympathy for Afghans affected by a recent earthquake and highlighted Iran’s commitment to providing humanitarian aid. Iravani stressed the importance of regional security and the necessity for constructive engagement with Afghanistan’s de facto authorities. He called for the release of frozen Afghan assets and advocated for a united, independent Afghanistan free from terrorism. He also underscored the critical role of the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA).