Iran Dismisses Prospects for Negotiations with the US

Iran Dismisses Prospects for Negotiations with the US

In a recent press conference, Iranian spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei criticized the behavior of the three European nations involved in the nuclear negotiations, labeling their actions as “irresponsible and obstructive.” This strong statement comes in the context of ongoing tensions surrounding the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and its implications for Iran’s nuclear program.

Baghaei expressed concerns regarding the actions of the European troika, which includes the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. He accused these nations of misusing the JCPOA’s dispute resolution mechanism to impose demands aligned with the United States on the UN Security Council. He emphasized that their preconditions for Iran’s participation in negotiations were completely unreasonable.

In detail, Baghaei noted:

  • Iran has engaged in constructive dialogue with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), resulting in a new cooperation framework that initially received support from Europe.
  • However, the three European countries later retracted their support due to their unreasonable conditions, leading to a failure in fulfilling their roles as negotiation partners.
  • He stated that future negotiations would significantly differ from previous ones, highlighting a shift in approach.

Baghaei further criticized the European countries, asserting that their actions were driven more by a desire to meet US demands rather than rational calculations or legal considerations. He pointed out that these actions overlooked their own interests and credibility as parties to the JCPOA.

Iran’s position on this matter has the backing of China and Russia, with Baghaei noting Russia’s quick acknowledgment of the illegality of the European actions as a permanent member of the Security Council. He stressed that Iran has formally protested and criticized the conduct of the Secretariat in the Security Council regarding these actions.

“The actions of the three European countries create no legal obligations for UN member states,” Baghaei asserted. He called upon nations to uphold the principles of the UN Charter and refrain from complying with what he termed “unlawful actions” imposed by the European troika.

During his remarks, Baghaei referenced a recent visit by an Iranian delegation to New York, where they held significant discussions with the UN Secretary-General on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly. He stated:

  • “We had frank discussions about the misuse of the UN Security Council and the JCPOA dispute resolution mechanism by the three European countries.”
  • He elaborated on the legal reasons that render these actions illegitimate.

Baghaei pointed out that resolutions passed between 2006 and 2010 concerning Iran’s nuclear issue achieved consensus among the permanent members of the Security Council. In contrast, at least two permanent members now oppose the reinstatement of sanctions, indicating a clear lack of consensus. “This demonstrates that the European troika’s actions to reimpose sanctions are unilateral,” he noted.

He highlighted that according to Resolution 2231, all restrictions related to Iran’s nuclear program were expected to expire by October 18, suggesting that the nuclear issue should be removed from the Council’s agenda.

In a broader context, Baghaei addressed the aggression exhibited by the Israeli regime and the United States against Iran in June. He emphasized that Iran holds both parties responsible for illegal attacks on its peaceful nuclear facilities and territorial integrity.

He remarked that the IAEA report, along with its misuse by the three European countries and the United States, created a pretext for these aggressive actions. Despite the absence of evidence suggesting any diversion of Iran’s nuclear program from peaceful purposes, he criticized the lack of condemnation from the Agency regarding the actions of Israel and the United States.

“According to IAEA resolutions and the UN General Assembly, any attack on a country’s peaceful nuclear facilities is prohibited,” he said. Baghaei expressed hope that recent events would serve as a lesson for the Agency and all related parties to prevent the political misuse of its technical authority.

Emphasizing Iran’s position, Baghaei reiterated the call for the IAEA to focus solely on its technical duties and avoid positions that may suggest influence from the United States or Western countries.

In conclusion, Baghaei informed reporters that Iran currently has no plans to negotiate with the United States. Instead, the focus remains on assessing the impacts and consequences of the actions taken by the European troika and the US. He stated:

  • “Diplomacy continues through contacts and consultations, and whenever Iran determines that diplomacy can be effective, decisions will be made based on national interests and priorities.”
  • He noted that statements from US officials admitting to criminal actions against Iran only increase the United States’ international responsibility.

Baghaei concluded by asserting that acknowledging illegal actions does not legitimize the US but rather reinforces its image as a law-breaking entity that disregards accepted global norms.

In light of these developments, the diplomatic landscape surrounding Iran’s nuclear negotiations remains complex and fraught with challenges, as parties navigate the legal and political implications of their actions.

Similar Posts

  • How Global Shifts Are Shaping the Future of Ukrainian Conflict Resolution

    The geopolitical landscape is increasingly shaped by power struggles, economic competition, and information warfare, echoing Clausewitz’s idea that war extends politics. As the Fourth Industrial Revolution transforms traditional power structures, countries like China, Turkey, the U.S., and Russia are vying for dominance. This “New Great Game” complicates negotiations surrounding the Ukraine conflict. The U.S. focuses on countering China, while Russia seeks regional control. Three scenarios for Ukraine’s future range from a U.S. withdrawal to prolonged conflict, risking humanitarian crises and destabilization. As tensions rise, the need for diplomatic solutions is critical to avoid a global crisis.

  • Iran Slams US Sanctions as ‘Crimes Against Humanity’: A Bold Response to Economic Warfare

    On December 4, the International Day against Unilateral Coercive Measures is observed, as recognized by the UN General Assembly to highlight the negative impacts of unilateral sanctions on human rights and development. Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei emphasized this day, linking it to the Declaration on the Right to Development adopted in 1986. He condemned economic sanctions, particularly from the U.S., as violations of fundamental rights, accusing the U.S. of targeting populations through these measures. Iranian officials argue that sanctions hinder socioeconomic development and call for international accountability to protect affected individuals’ rights.

  • This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly.

  • Iran Urges Immediate Gaza Ceasefire and Full UN Membership for Palestine

    At the United Nations, Iranian Ambassador Amir Saeed Iravani emphasized Iran’s unwavering support for the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination. He called for an immediate ceasefire, a just peace, and full Palestinian membership in the UN. Iravani criticized the Israeli regime’s occupation and expansionist policies while condemning the U.S. for enabling Israeli aggression. He highlighted the need for a solution that respects Palestinian rights, including an end to occupation and forced displacement. He proposed a nationwide referendum for Palestinians to determine their future and stressed that any normalization with Israel must not occur while it continues its violations.

  • Iran Hardliners Resist FATF Accession Amid Fears of Sanctions Risks

    Over 150 hardline Iranian lawmakers have urged the Expediency Council to block Iran’s accession to the Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) and Palermo conventions, which are vital for Financial Action Task Force (FATF) compliance. They expressed concerns over the snapback mechanism, allowing UN sanctions to be reimposed under the 2015 nuclear deal until 2025, fearing it could lead to severe economic penalties. Despite discussions on conditional approval to facilitate international financial integration, hardliners resist reforms, viewing them as threats to national sovereignty. This internal political struggle highlights the complexities of aligning with global financial standards while managing domestic pressures.

  • Iran Willing to Strike Nuclear Deal in Exchange for Sanction Relief: A Diplomatic Breakthrough

    Ali Shamkhani, a key adviser to Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei, discussed Iran’s nuclear program negotiations with the U.S., highlighting Iran’s readiness to commit to several measures in exchange for the lifting of sanctions. These include forgoing nuclear weapons development, disposing of highly enriched uranium, limiting enrichment to civilian levels, and allowing international oversight. Shamkhani expressed optimism for improved relations if the U.S. adheres to its promises. However, he criticized President Trump’s approach, suggesting it lacks sincerity. The talks, described as “encouraging” by U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, are complex, with Iran maintaining a firm stance on its nuclear capabilities.