Controversial Decision: Dissolving Hezbollah’s Cultural Association Sparks Outrage

In a surprising move amidst the ongoing U.S.-led Israeli aggression and a crippling economic crisis, the Lebanese government has shifted its focus to a draft resolution aimed at dissolving the Lebanese Association for Arts. This decision, introduced by Interior Minister Ahmad Hajjar, is framed under the guise of “violating applicable regulations” and follows the recent lighting of Raouche Rock with images of Hezbollah’s leaders, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and Sayyed Hashem Safieddine. The timing raises concerns about the true motivations behind this initiative.

The proposed dissolution is not merely a legal issue, as the government wants to suggest; it appears to be a politically charged action aimed at undermining cultural expression. Instead of tackling the pressing issues of economic collapse or the threats posed by Israel, the government is focusing on diminishing a cultural activity that embodies the freedom of expression enshrined in Article 13 of the Lebanese Constitution. This article guarantees the rights to freedom of opinion, assembly, and association without the need for prior licensing.

Legal Implications of the Proposed Dissolution

Legally speaking, the executive authority lacks the power to dissolve an association operating within the bounds of the law unless there is a final and binding judicial decision made through an official lawsuit. Additionally, the association must be granted the opportunity to defend itself. Thus, the attempt to dissolve Resalat is a blatant violation of the separation of powers and infringes upon judicial authority.

Hezbollah MP Hassan Fadlallah has voiced his concerns regarding the government’s actions. In an interview with Al-Manar TV, he stated, “God willing, they won’t make a mistake, because no one takes anything from us in a challenge.” He further addressed Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, asserting, “Your decision is as useless as a chocolate teapot [translated from a Lebanese idiom].” Fadlallah plans to represent the association in Parliament, emphasizing that the government’s handling of the Raouche event undermines the state’s prestige.

The Cultural Impact of Political Actions

This proposed dissolution marks a new chapter in the ongoing soft war against the Resistance, aiming to suppress awareness and undermine the cultural identity it protects. Cultural targeting is a form of political and media blockade, attempting to silence the artistic resistance that has persisted despite foreign military aggression and external pressures.

Ironically, the government perceives the Resalat association as a hostile entity while simultaneously releasing Riad Salamé, the former governor of Banque du Liban, known for his role in plundering the nation’s wealth, alongside several collaborators with Israel. This juxtaposition highlights the absurdity of the government’s priorities.

The Role of Resalat Association

The Resalat association is not just another cultural institution; it has significantly contributed to Lebanon’s artistic landscape. Over the years, it has showcased sophisticated musical, theatrical, and operatic works, established a world-class orchestra, and launched initiatives to support both Lebanese and Arab creatives. Its history underscores that it nurtures national culture rather than posing a threat to the state.

The implications of this draft resolution are far-reaching. It not only targets a specific association but also sets a dangerous constitutional precedent. Should this resolution pass, it would empower future governments to dissolve associations or revoke their licenses based on shifting political sentiments. This poses a substantial threat to the future of civil society and cultural life in Lebanon.

The Future of Freedom of Expression in Lebanon

Lebanon, once celebrated for its freedom and openness, risks becoming a pale imitation of the oppressive regimes found in the Persian Gulf, where thought and art are stifled. Approving this bill would effectively signal the end of freedom of expression in Lebanon and obliterate the cultural resistance that has been one of the nation’s most notable achievements.

In conclusion, the Lebanese government’s focus on dissolving the Resalat association amidst significant national challenges raises critical questions about its priorities and intentions. The cultural and artistic landscape of Lebanon hangs in the balance, and the outcome of this legislative move could redefine the country’s commitment to freedom of expression and cultural identity.