Urgent Warning: UN Faces Irrelevance Over Gaza Crisis, Says Expert Alfred de Zayas

Urgent Warning: UN Faces Irrelevance Over Gaza Crisis, Says Expert Alfred de Zayas

As the United Nations General Assembly prepares for its 80th session in New York on September 9, 2025, the credibility of this global institution is facing intense scrutiny. With the ongoing conflict in Gaza capturing international attention, concerns are rising about whether the UN can effectively address the crisis or if it will remain hindered by geopolitical divisions. To provide insights into these urgent matters, the Tehran Times engaged in an exclusive interview with Professor Alfred de Zayas, a prominent figure in international law and a former UN Independent Expert on International Order. During this comprehensive discussion, de Zayas highlights Israel’s violations of the Geneva Conventions and the Genocide Convention, the complicity of Western powers, and the failures of international courts. He cautions that without decisive action from the UN General Assembly (UNGA) under the “Uniting for Peace” resolution, the UN risks losing its authority in global governance.

Below is the full text of the interview:

The President of the 80th session of the General Assembly is the former German Foreign Minister Analena Baerbock, who has been criticized for her support of military actions that violate the UN Charter, particularly concerning Israel.

How do you assess the application of international law, including the Geneva Conventions and the Genocide Convention, in the context of Israel’s military actions in Gaza? To what extent do these actions constitute war crimes or genocide under international law?

As the General Assembly opens its 80th session on September 9, 2025, its authority and credibility are at stake. The primary agenda should focus on halting the ongoing genocide against the Palestinians, yet the UN has struggled to stop Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity. Alarmingly, Israel continues to receive support from the “collective West,” which is complicit in these actions and is openly defying the UN Charter and international law.

However, a new world order is emerging, driven by the awakening of the “Global Majority,” which is rejecting the imperialism and colonialism of the “collective West.” The General Assembly should urgently adopt a “Uniting for Peace” Resolution that authorizes military intervention to prevent genocide and impose accountability on the perpetrators.

The existence of the State of Israel is linked to the United Nations, yet the conditions for Israel’s statehood and UN membership have been consistently violated. Israel’s actions since its inception demonstrate a blatant disregard for international law and moral obligations. Historically, Israel emerged from acts of terrorism perpetrated by Zionist settlers against Palestinians, the British, and even UN officials.

  • Security Council Resolution 242 (1967) demanded Israel’s withdrawal from occupied territories.
  • The Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) have affirmed that Israel must adhere to the Fourth Geneva Convention.
  • The 2024 Advisory Opinion ruled Israel’s presence in occupied territories as unlawful and mandated the cessation of settlement activities.

On September 18, 2024, the UN General Assembly endorsed the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion, providing Israel a 12-month deadline to comply. Despite this, Israel has intensified its actions against Palestinians, leading to accusations of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Israel is openly defying international law and should be expelled from the UN under Article 6 of the UN Charter. The General Assembly must take action by imposing sanctions on Israel and urging member states to uphold their Responsibility to Protect the Palestinian population.

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is accused of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Despite these serious allegations, there has been no genuine effort to arrest him, and he continues to receive honors in various nations.

What are the legal implications of Israel’s claim to self-defense in Gaza, given its status as an occupying power under international law?

Israel’s claim of self-defense lacks validity under international law. The ICJ has repeatedly classified Israel as an occupying state, bound by international humanitarian and human rights law. Notably, the right to self-defense outlined in Article 51 of the UN Charter does not apply to Israel in this context, as it is not defending against another state’s aggression but is committing acts of genocide against an occupied population.

The situation in Gaza is reminiscent of the Warsaw Ghetto, where the oppressors had no legitimate claim to self-defense against the oppressed population. Israel’s claim falls flat, especially when the rights of the Palestinian people to resist occupation are considered.

How effective do you believe the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) have been in addressing war crimes committed by Israel in Gaza? What reforms or actions are needed to end selective justice?

The ICJ has made significant legal pronouncements, including the ongoing case of South Africa v. Israel, which is expected to provide clarity regarding Israel’s actions. Yet, the lack of enforcement mechanisms means that the ICJ’s judgments often remain unenforced, making it a less effective body.

The ICC differs in its operational challenges. Critics argue that the ICC has been primarily influenced by Western interests, selectively prosecuting leaders from the Global South while ignoring crimes committed by Western leaders. Recent warrants for Netanyahu and his former Minister of War suggest a shift, yet the credibility of the ICC remains in question.

How has the “hijacking” of human rights institutions affected the UN’s ability to hold Israel accountable for violations in Gaza?

Many UN agencies have been compromised by external political interests, undermining their ability to uphold human rights effectively. The UN’s self-serving nature has become evident with leaders like Baerbock, whose history raises concerns about the impartiality of the General Assembly.

Israel’s actions in Gaza, characterized by genocide, have not only drawn international outrage but have also positioned the US, UK, and European states as complicit in these crimes.

How does the selective weaponization of human rights rhetoric impact the credibility of human rights advocacy in conflicts like Gaza?

Despite the challenges, there are signs of change. Organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have begun to categorize Israel’s actions as genocide. The International Association of Genocide Scholars recently passed a resolution urging Israel to cease its genocidal policies.

What practical steps can the international community take to ensure the protection of civilians in Gaza and uphold Palestinian rights under international law?

Rhetoric alone will not suffice. It is crucial for states to sever commercial and diplomatic ties with Israel to pressure it as a genocidal state. A collective stance from nations against Israel’s actions, coupled with the adoption of a “Uniting for Peace” resolution, could pave the way for decisive action to protect Palestinian lives.

Independent journalists and civil society have a vital role in combating misinformation and advocating for the oppressed. Their efforts are essential to restoring integrity to human rights advocacy and ensuring that the voices of the marginalized are heard.

As the UN General Assembly convenes, it is crucial for civil society and independent journalists to demand accountability and assert the authority of the UN to condemn the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

Similar Posts

  • Araghchi Set to Deliver Pezeshkian’s Key Message to Chinese Leaders

    Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi visited Beijing to discuss Iran’s civilian nuclear program and ongoing indirect negotiations with the U.S. This visit highlights the strengthening relationship between Iran and China amid shifting geopolitical dynamics. Araghchi expressed gratitude for China’s support of Iran’s nuclear ambitions and conveyed a message from President Pezeshkian to Chinese leaders, emphasizing their strategic partnership. As Iran engages in talks facilitated by Oman, Araghchi underscored the importance of consultations with China and Russia. The visit aims to deepen bilateral ties and reflects both nations’ commitment to expanding cooperation across various sectors, impacting regional stability and international security.

  • Global Outcry: Mass Protests Erupt Worldwide Over Gaza Conflict

    On April 14 and 15, global protests erupted in support of Gaza, condemning Israeli military actions and U.S. support. Notably, Palestinian student activist Mohsen Mahdawi was arrested during a citizenship interview, with his legal team arguing it was retaliation against pro-Palestinian activism. Protests spanned Turkey, Europe, Tunisia, South Korea, and Senegal, where demonstrators called for justice, an end to violence, and lifting blockades on Gaza. The widespread demonstrations reflect escalating international anger over the conflict and urge governments to reconsider foreign policies regarding Israel, highlighting the urgent need for solidarity and humanitarian action for Palestinians.

  • Uniting Nations: Fostering Brotherhood and Shaping Tomorrow’s Futures

    The recent visit of Iranian President Dr. Masoud Pezeshkian to Pakistan symbolizes a strengthening relationship between the two nations, emphasizing their historical ties and shared values amidst global uncertainties. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif strongly condemned Israel’s aggression towards Iran, reflecting the sentiments of Pakistanis. The visit resulted in twelve agreements across various sectors, aiming to increase bilateral trade from $3 billion to $10 billion. Both countries are committed to enhancing their partnership through cultural affinity and mutual respect, positioning their relationship as a potential model for regional stability and cooperation in the face of external pressures.

  • Devastating Airstrikes: Somali Forces Eliminate 82 Al-Shabaab Terrorists in Major Victory

    The National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) has intensified operations against al-Shabaab in Somalia, particularly in the Lower Shabelle region. Recent airstrikes in Sabiid and Canoole targeted militants, resulting in 19 injuries and emphasizing civilian safety. NISA’s actions, based on intelligence about al-Shabaab disruptions, aim to protect locals, advising them to avoid conflict areas. This response follows al-Shabaab’s attacks on Somali troops. The government is committed to eradicating terrorism through military and community collaboration, focusing on rebuilding trust and providing humanitarian aid. NISA’s efforts highlight the ongoing battle for stability and safety in Somalia.

  • Netanyahu’s Upcoming US Visit: Key Talks on Iran and Trump’s Tariffs

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to visit the White House on Monday to meet with President Donald Trump, focusing on key issues such as tariffs, Iran’s nuclear program, and the Gaza conflict. Netanyahu aims to negotiate the removal of trade tariffs and address concerns over Iran’s nuclear ambitions, expressing skepticism about a US-Iran nuclear deal. The discussions may also explore military options against Iran if diplomacy fails, prompting strong warnings from Iranian officials against potential military action. This visit highlights the significance of US-Israel relations amid ongoing regional challenges, with potential long-term implications for international relations.

  • Iran Slams US Airstrikes Targeting Yemen’s Strategic Ras Isa Port

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei condemned recent US military actions as significant aggression and violations of international law. He argued that these actions support Israeli violence against Palestinians and exacerbate regional instability, particularly in Yemen, where US interventions have devastating effects on civilians. Baghaei urged for solidarity among Islamic nations and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to address these violations and advocate for the affected populations. His statement emphasizes the need for a reevaluation of US foreign policies and collective action to prioritize peace and security in the Middle East, warning that inaction could lead to further destabilization.