Pakistan Launches Repatriation of 1.3 Million Afghan PoR Holders: A New Chapter in Migration

Pakistan Launches Repatriation of 1.3 Million Afghan PoR Holders: A New Chapter in Migration

The repatriation and deportation of Afghan refugees in Pakistan is set to commence on September 1, 2025, affecting over 1.3 million individuals holding Proof of Registration (PoR) cards. This decision follows a recent announcement from the interior ministry, which declared that PoR cardholders, the last group of Afghans legally residing in Pakistan, have become unlawful residents due to the expiration of their cards on June 30, 2025.

A letter dated August 4 from the interior ministry was addressed to the chief secretaries and police chiefs across the four provinces, including Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, outlining the implementation of the Illegal Foreigners Repatriation Plan (IFRP). The letter emphasized that voluntary returns for PoR cardholders would begin immediately, while formal repatriation and deportation efforts would start on September 1, 2025.

In addition, the ministry confirmed that the repatriation process for illegal foreign nationals, including holders of Afghan Citizen Cards (ACC), would persist as previously determined under the IFRP. The ministry’s communication included directives for relevant agencies to compile databases of PoR cardholders, enabling a structured approach to repatriation efforts.

  • The National Database and Registration Authority (Nadra) will assist in deregistering returning Afghans at transit points and border terminals.
  • The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) will aid in the repatriation process at designated border crossings.
  • Provincial governments and relevant agencies are urged to map all PoR cardholders and create specific action plans for their repatriation.

The implementation of the IFRP has prompted discussions among local authorities. A recent meeting of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Provincial Steering Committee (PSC) focused on the execution of this plan. The minutes of the meeting revealed several key decisions:

  • District administrations and police are to form teams and engage with Afghan elders to promote voluntary repatriation.
  • Deputy commissioners are tasked with remapping PoR cardholders in their respective areas.
  • The PSC recommended operationalizing the Peshawar and Landi Kotal transit points to full capacity.

Furthermore, the committee suggested that the Commissionerate of Afghan Refugees should de-notify refugee camps that are no longer functioning as intended. The Commissionerate was also asked to provide information regarding the registration categories of individuals still residing in these camps.

Regarding local transit points, the PSC advised that decisions about the deportation of local individuals should involve the relevant deputy commissioner, military authorities, and Nadra’s guidance. This measure aims to ensure that deportation points are designated solely for local cases, with Torkham remaining the primary exit point for Afghans.

In March 2025, official sources indicated that Pakistani authorities had already communicated to their Afghan counterparts that PoR cards would not be extended past June 30, 2025. According to the UNHCR, there were over 1.3 million Afghans living in Pakistan as of that date, with distribution across various provinces:

  • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: 717,945
  • Balochistan: 326,584
  • Punjab: 195,188
  • Sindh: 75,510
  • Islamabad: 43,154

The issuance of PoR cards began in 2004-05, supported by the UNHCR, and was supplemented by the introduction of Afghan Citizenship Cards (ACC) in 2016 through amendments to the Foreigners Act of 1946.

In light of these developments, the UNHCR has expressed concern regarding Pakistan’s plans to forcibly repatriate Afghan refugees holding PoR cards. The agency recently reported numerous incidents of arrests and detentions involving Afghans across the country, including PoR cardholders.

The UN agency acknowledged Pakistan’s long-standing generosity in hosting refugees for over four decades, despite its own challenges. However, they highlighted that the forced return of PoR cardholders, who have been recognized as refugees for many years, contradicts Pakistan’s humanitarian approach and could violate the principle of non-refoulement.

As the repatriation process unfolds, the international community is closely monitoring the situation, advocating for the rights and safety of Afghan refugees in Pakistan.

Similar Posts

  • This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded with more detailed information…

  • Iran and Egypt Foreign Ministers Collaborate on U.S. Talks in Muscat

    Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and Egypt’s Badr Abdelatty discussed recent negotiations between Iran and the U.S. during a phone call. Araqchi shared insights from his indirect talks with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff, focusing on Iran’s peaceful nuclear program. Abdelatty expressed Egypt’s support for these negotiations and addressed challenges in restoring a ceasefire in Gaza. Both ministers emphasized the urgent need to halt Israeli attacks on Gaza and called for an end to Israeli aggression in Syria and Lebanon. Their conversation also highlighted the importance of strengthening bilateral relations to tackle mutual concerns.

  • This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly.

  • Iran Judiciary Chief Predicts Promising Future for Resistance Front

    Iran’s Judiciary Chief Gholam-Hossein Mohseni Ejei reaffirmed the resilience of the Resistance Movement in a meeting with Iraq’s Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani, highlighting its vitality across Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine. He stressed Iran’s unwavering support for resistance groups and the importance of historical and cultural ties between Iran and Iraq to enhance bilateral relations. Mohseni Ejei also mentioned the recent signing of 14 cooperation documents during Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian’s visit to Iraq, urging swift implementation. Al-Mashhadani acknowledged Iran’s support for the Islamic Ummah, particularly during the Gaza conflict, underscoring the enduring alliance between Iran, Iraq, Hamas, and Hezbollah.

  • Iran Urges Germany to Investigate WWII-Era Chemical Weapons Supply to Iraq

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baqaei, urged Germany to establish a mechanism to investigate its historical role in supplying chemical weapons to Iraq during Saddam Hussein’s regime. This plea coincides with the anniversary of the Chemical Weapons Convention, which seeks to prevent chemical warfare. Baqaei stressed that uncovering the truth is essential for justice, particularly regarding the support provided to Saddam’s chemical weapons program. The Iraq-Iran War saw over 500 chemical attacks, resulting in thousands of Iranian casualties. Baqaei’s statement highlights ongoing health issues faced by survivors, compounded by Western sanctions limiting access to medical supplies.

  • Uncertainty Looms: Will the US Uphold Its Bilateral Agreements?

    Many nations are increasingly questioning the credibility of the United States in international negotiations, largely due to its withdrawals from significant agreements under Donald Trump’s presidency, which he has been dubbed “The Enemy of Treaties.” Key exits included the Paris Agreement and the Iran nuclear deal. Since Trump’s return to power in 2025, this trend has continued, further undermining international institutions and raising concerns among US allies. Motivated by economic concerns and accusations of bias, US foreign policy often prioritizes unilateral dominance, complicating global relations. This skepticism extends to future commitments, with analysts suggesting a need for other powers to challenge US policies.