Judiciary Official Warns: Distorting Persian Gulf's Name Threatens Iran's Historical Identity

Judiciary Official Warns: Distorting Persian Gulf’s Name Threatens Iran’s Historical Identity

In a recent statement, Nasser Seraj, the Judiciary’s deputy for international affairs, emphasized the significance of the Persian Gulf’s historical name. He warned that any efforts to alter its name would be viewed as a hostile and provocative act.

Seraj, who also serves as the secretary of Iran’s High Council for Human Rights, expressed his concerns on Saturday. He stated that:

“Distorting the name of the Persian Gulf is a violation of the fundamental principles of human rights, cultural rights of nations, and an attack on the historical identity of Iranians.”

He further elaborated on the importance of the Persian Gulf, highlighting that:

  • The Persian Gulf is an inseparable part of Iranian history.
  • This strategic waterway has deep roots in human civilization.
  • It has been recognized by the same name for centuries in maps, official documents, and diplomatic correspondence.

Seraj clarified that the attempts to change the ancient name of the Persian Gulf are:

  1. Completely political.
  2. Biased.
  3. Rooted in anti-Iranian intentions from those known for their hostility towards the country.

He noted that Iran has accepted names such as the Sea of Oman, the Indian Ocean, the Arabian Sea, and the Red Sea in line with international norms. However, he stressed that any efforts to distort the name of the Persian Gulf are merely attempts to:

Provoke public opinion and hurt the national feelings of Iranians.

Seraj praised the Iranian people for their “proud outburst and protests,” stating that their anger and unparalleled unity serve as a decisive response to biased narratives. He asserted that the Persian Gulf is not just a geographical area, but:

“A part of the soul of the Iranian nation.”

Moreover, he warned that any move by Google and other international platforms to misname the Persian Gulf would ultimately undermine their credibility.

Similar Posts

  • Baghdad’s Kurdish Disarmament: A Strategic Move for a Tehran Agreement

    Iraqi authorities’ recent ban on militant group activities in Iraqi Kurdistan has raised security, legal, and human rights concerns. The security agreement between Iran and Iraq aims to enhance border security, strengthen national sovereignty, and establish legal cooperation to address threats from anti-Iranian armed groups. Implementing disarmament, ensuring judicial accountability for past crimes, and providing humane reintegration for former members are crucial. Additionally, sustainable development in border regions is necessary to create job opportunities and improve infrastructure, fostering stability and reducing extremism. This comprehensive approach could lead to a more secure future for both nations.

  • This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly.

  • Tehran’s Mega-Crisis: Confronting Seven Major Challenges Ahead

    Iran’s clerical government is facing a severe “mega-crisis,” characterized by seven significant domestic and international challenges threatening its stability. Key issues include setbacks for proxy groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, increasing tensions with Israel, and the potential return of a hardline U.S. administration under Donald Trump. Additionally, Europe has adopted a tougher stance against Iran over military support for Russia and nuclear concerns. Domestically, the economy is collapsing, public dissatisfaction is rising, and unrest is brewing. Compounding these crises is the uncertainty surrounding the succession of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, further destabilizing the regime.

  • Iran Pledges Strong Commitment to Strengthening Agreements with Iraq

    In a recent phone call, Iranian official Pezeshkian extended Eid al-Fitr wishes to Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ Al-Sudani, highlighting the strong friendship between Iran and Iraq. Pezeshkian emphasized Iran’s commitment to operationalize agreements to enhance bilateral relations and counter external threats. Al-Sudani reciprocated with warm greetings and stressed the need for unity among Islamic nations, underscoring the importance of the Iran-Iraq partnership for regional stability. He affirmed Iraq’s dedication to strengthening economic and political ties with Iran. This dialogue exemplifies the ongoing collaboration and shared cultural connections that can bolster regional security and prosperity amid external pressures.

  • Iran Refutes Claims of Secret Parallel Negotiations with the U.S.

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei has rejected claims of parallel negotiations with the U.S., emphasizing that the only talks occurring involve Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, with four rounds mediated by Oman focusing on Iran’s nuclear program and U.S. sanctions. Baqaei labeled the halting of uranium enrichment as “non-negotiable” and criticized U.S. negotiating practices as unorthodox. He also warned against European threats regarding the snapback mechanism, suggesting they undermine diplomacy. Additionally, he expressed concerns over potential Israeli sabotage of negotiations and called for global vigilance against Israel’s actions in Gaza and the West Bank.

  • Geneva Negotiations: E3’s Push to Lift Sanctions Takes Center Stage, Says MP

    During the Geneva talks, Iranian diplomats, led by Ebrahim Rezaei, emphasized their primary goal of lifting Western sanctions against Tehran. Following a committee session, Rezaei highlighted Iran’s commitment to respond decisively to any aggression towards its facilities. He warned that if the E3 (Britain, France, Germany) activate the snapback mechanism, Iran may invoke Article X of the Non-Proliferation Treaty and consider withdrawal. The Iranian Foreign Ministry insisted on no preconditions in the negotiations. These discussions, the second round since November, are crucial amid the U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal and the subsequent re-imposition of sanctions on Iran.