Naim Qassem Declares: 'Ready to Fight for Karbala if Necessary!'

Naim Qassem Declares: ‘Ready to Fight for Karbala if Necessary!’

Hezbollah Secretary General Sheikh Naim Qassem addressed a large crowd during the commemoration of Arbaeen, emphasizing the significance of the struggle for justice and resistance against tyranny. His message highlighted the enduring legacy of Imam Hussein (a.s.) and its relevance in contemporary conflicts, particularly in the context of the ongoing struggles faced by Lebanon and Palestine.

During his speech, Qassem stated, “We are on the path of salvation, thanks to the jihad and revolution of Imam Hussein (a.s.). People at every milestone have to choose either to be with Imam Hussein (a.s.) or to be with Yazid.” He underscored the importance of aligning with the rightful path, asserting that the choice today is to stand with the modern-day representatives of Imam Hussein, notably Imam Khomeini and Imam Khamenei.

Qassem drew parallels between historical figures and current leaders, asserting that “Sheikh Ragheb Harb, Sayyed Abbas Al-Moussawi, and Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah walked the same path of Imam Khomeini and Imam Khamenei.” He framed the ongoing struggle for liberation, particularly in Palestine, as a continuation of the principles established during the Battle of Karbala.

  • Resistance Against Oppression: Qassem emphasized the need for resistance against modern-day oppressors, specifically the United States and Israeli forces, whom he referred to as the “Yazid of the era.”
  • The Legacy of Karbala: He described the Resistance as an extension of the events that took place in Karbala, asserting that it embodies the spirit of fighting against injustice.
  • 2006 Victory: Qassem recalled the significance of the 2006 victory, which he attributed to “Mohammadi-Alawite support” and divine assistance, stating that it served as a deterrent against enemy aggression for 17 years.

Further elaborating on the role of the Islamic Republic, Qassem stated, “The Islamic Republic is still on our side and will remain so, just as the flag of resistance will remain raised.” He reinforced the idea that the presence of the Resistance is crucial for maintaining Lebanese sovereignty and preventing Israeli incursions.

In a critical analysis of the Lebanese government, Qassem argued that the government’s actions align with US-Israeli interests, particularly in efforts to undermine the Resistance. He remarked, “This Lebanese Government implements the US-Israeli order to end the Resistance.” He accused the government of failing to safeguard Lebanese territory and questioned its allegiance when it received praise from Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.

  • Call to Action: Qassem urged the government to focus on nation-building rather than succumbing to external pressures, emphasizing its responsibility to protect the Lebanese people.
  • Consequences of Inaction: He warned that the government’s decisions could lead to severe internal strife, stating that any failure to act decisively against aggression would place the entire nation at risk.

He concluded with a powerful message about the resilience of the Resistance, stating, “The Resistance will never surrender its weapons while the aggression continues; we’ll fight a Karbala battle if necessary, and we are confident that we’ll be victorious.” His closing remarks served as a rallying cry for unity among Lebanon’s people, urging them to stand firm against external threats.

Qassem’s statements resonate deeply with many who view the ongoing conflicts in the region through the lens of historical struggles for justice. The call for unity and resistance against perceived oppression remains a central theme in Hezbollah’s ideology and actions.

As he highlighted the importance of historical memory and its implications for present-day struggles, Qassem’s address during Arbaeen serves as a reminder of the enduring impact of Imam Hussein’s legacy on contemporary movements for justice and sovereignty.

In summary, Sheikh Naim Qassem’s speech at the Arbaeen gathering emphasizes the importance of resistance, the consequences of governmental actions, and the enduring legacy of Imam Hussein (a.s.) in the fight against tyranny. The call for unity and strength among the Lebanese people and their allies remains as relevant today as it was during the historical events of Karbala.

Similar Posts

  • This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly.

  • Iran Asserts Its Right to Withdraw from the NPT: A Bold Move in Global Nuclear Politics

    On August 28, 2025, the UK, France, and Germany (E3) announced plans to activate the “snapback” mechanism under UN Security Council Resolution 2231, prompting Iran to denounce the move as “unjustified and illegal.” Iran has vowed to respond to protect its rights amid rising tensions over its nuclear program. Professor Hongda Fan suggests that while Iran’s potential withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is an option, it may lead to stricter sanctions. He advises Iran to engage in negotiations, clarify its national interests, and strengthen ties with Eastern nations to navigate the escalating geopolitical pressures effectively.

  • Unlocking Harmony: Pezeshkian Advocates for Debates as a Solution to Disagreements

    In a recent address at the National Iranian Student Debate Championships, President Masoud Pezeshkian underscored the importance of debates in resolving disagreements and fostering dialogue in society. He emphasized that promoting a culture of dialogue is vital for raising public awareness, enhancing citizen participation, and strengthening national integration. Pezeshkian highlighted the need for interaction and collective wisdom to address challenges in today’s complex world. The debate competition not only assesses students’ skills but also cultivates dialogue etiquette, respect for differing views, and tolerance. He asserted that advancing debate culture will enhance public awareness and national cohesion.

  • This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded soon. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly. This article will be expanded with more detailed information shortly.

  • Israel Urges Diplomatic Dialogue with Iran, Stresses No Intentions for War

    Tensions between Iran and Israel surged after Israel’s unprovoked attack on June 13, leading to a 12-day war marked by the assassination of Iranian military leaders and civilian casualties. The U.S. intervened with airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, escalating the conflict. The war ended on June 24 after Iran retaliated, forcing Israel to cease operations. Russian President Putin, during a summit, indicated Israeli requests for diplomatic communication with Iran, advocating for negotiations over confrontation. Iran blamed the U.S. and Europe for the escalation, especially after the U.S. exited the 2015 nuclear deal, complicating diplomatic efforts regarding its nuclear program.

  • Iran Maintains Uranium Enrichment Capability, Warns FM

    In a recent Financial Times interview, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi discussed the complexities of potential nuclear negotiations amid rising tensions following a conflict with Israel. He stated that Iran demands financial compensation for damages and guarantees against military aggression before resuming talks. Araghchi emphasized the need for a “win-win solution” and expressed skepticism towards U.S. intentions, citing past actions. He acknowledged ongoing communications with U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff but insisted that substantial confidence-building measures are essential. Araghchi also criticized European nations for their inability to lift sanctions, warning that reimposing them would end diplomatic engagement.