Israeli General Credits Trump with Saving Soldiers’ Lives Through Historic Truce Deal

In a compelling interview on Israeli radio, retired Major General Yizkhak Barik made significant statements regarding Israel’s ongoing conflict with Hamas. His insights reveal a stark reality about the challenges faced by the Israeli military, emphasizing that “Israel did not defeat Hamas.” This assertion has stirred discussions within military and political circles, shedding light on the complexities of the situation.

Barik elaborated on the limitations of the Israeli army, stating that it is “too small” to effectively dismantle a well-entrenched organization like Hamas. He expressed skepticism about the celebratory narratives surrounding military successes, labeling them as “nonsense.” Below are some key points from Barik’s interview:

• Hamas’s Tunnel Network: Barik revealed that Hamas possesses approximately 500 kilometers of tunnels, with the Israeli forces having destroyed less than 10 percent of them.
• Hamas’s Fighter Strength: According to Barik, Hamas currently has around 25,000 fighters, indicating a strong and resilient force.
• Ground Operations: He emphasized the necessity of maintaining a ground presence to achieve any substantial victory against Hamas.
• Current Military Status: Barik pointed out that the number of Hamas forces has returned to its pre-war levels, highlighting the ongoing challenges.

When pressed about the honesty of military reports, Barik did not hold back, stating, “A big lie!” He articulated concerns regarding the atmosphere of fear among military officers, which he believes prevents them from conveying the full truth about the situation on the ground. This sentiment underscores a significant dilemma: the disconnect between public perception and military reality.

Barik’s comments raise crucial questions about the operational strategies being employed and the potential implications for Israel’s military objectives. He stated, “All the celebrations that are being held under the pretext of conquering Gaza and winning the war are nonsense.” Such statements challenge the prevailing narratives often portrayed in media and political discourse.

Furthermore, Barik acknowledged the complexities of the battlefield, suggesting that the current military efforts are not yielding the desired outcomes. He remarked on the dangers faced by Israeli soldiers, noting that former U.S. President Donald Trump played a role in preventing additional casualties during military engagements in Gaza. This highlights the intricate relationship between international politics and local military strategies.

In conclusion, Barik’s insights provide a sobering perspective on the ongoing conflict with Hamas. His assertions about the inadequacies of the Israeli military, the resilience of Hamas, and the challenges of truthful communication within military ranks prompt a reevaluation of Israel’s strategic approach. As the situation develops, it remains critical for both military leaders and political figures to address these realities transparently, ensuring that stakeholders understand the complexities of the conflict.